Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 41, 125-133, January 1, 1981]
© 1981 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, J.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, Y.-W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, J.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, Y.-W.

Influence of Limited Proteolysis on the Physicochemical and DNA-binding Properties of Glucocorticoid Receptors from Corticoid-sensitive and -resistant Mouse Lymphoma P17981

John Stevens2 and Yee-Wan Stevens

Research Institute, Joint Diseases North General Hospital, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10035

We have compared the DNA-cellulose-binding properties of cytosolic [3H]triamcinolone acetonide ([3H]TA)-receptor complexes from the corticoid-sensitive (CS) and corticoid-resistant (CR) strains of mouse lymphoma P1798. About 50% of heat-activated 61-Å (Stokes radius) CS complexes and close to 60% of heat-activated 28-Å (Stokes radius) CR complexes bound to DNA-cellulose. [3H]TA complexes from the CR lymphocytes were more refractory to extraction from DNA-cellulose with MgCl2, spermidine, and KCl than were complexes from the CS cells. This behavior closely mimics the type of interaction previously observed after nuclear binding of [3H]TA in intact P1798 cells at 37°.

Limited digestion (30 min at 10°) of the 61-Å CS P1798 [3H]TA complex with chymotrypsin converted it to a 28-Å form in which interaction with DNA-cellulose (i.e., extractability with MgCl2, spermidine, and KCl) was indistinguishable from the interaction with DNA-cellulose of undigested 28-Å CR P1798 [3H]TA-receptor complexes. Chymotrypsin treatment (30 min; 10°) of [3H]TA complexes from CR lymphocytes did not alter their Stokes radius or their extractability from DNA-cellulose. Proteolysis (30 min; 10°) of CS and CR P1798 [3H]TA complexes with trypsin gave rise to a discrete 19-Å (Stokes radius) fragment that did not bind to DNA-cellulose. In all instances, the Stokes radii were determined on heat-activated (1 hr; 20°) [3H]TA-receptor complexes.

Our results suggest that differences in glucocorticoid-receptor complex interaction with the nucleus between CS and CR P1798 lymphocytes may be determined by receptor properties. Furthermore, our findings are consistent with the idea that DNA and/or other anionic species may be an important part of nuclear acceptor sites in both strains of tumor. Our data also support the hypothesis that the portion of the CS P1798 complex that is digested by chymotrypsin, i.e., the 61 -> 28 Å region, may play an important role in modulating glucocorticoid-receptor complex interaction with the nucleus in CS tumor lymphocytes.

1 Supported by NIH Grants CA 14987 and P 30 14194.

2 Scholar of the Leukemia Society of America, Inc. To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 6/12/80. Accepted 10/ 8/80.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1981 by the American Association for Cancer Research.