Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 41, 3881-3884, October 1, 1981]
© 1981 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ritch, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Shackney, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ritch, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Shackney, S. E.

Schedule-dependent Synergism of Combinations of Hydroxyurea with Adriamycin and 1-ß-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine with Adriamycin

Paul S. Ritch1, Sandra J. Occhipinti, Robert E. Cunningham and Stanley E. Shackney

Clinical Pharmacology Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20205

The lethal effects of combinations of adriamycin (ADR) and either hydroxyurea (HU) or 1-ß-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C) were studied in relation to drug-scheduling interval in Sarcoma 180 cells grown in vitro. Drug lethality was determined by cell cloning in soft agar. Serial kinetic changes induced by a priming dose of HU or ara-C were monitored by flow cytometry and related to schedule-dependent cell killing by ADR. All drug exposures were for 1 hr. When ADR was given together with either HU or ara-C, cell log kill was additive. However, when ADR was given after exposure to either HU or ara-C, cell killing was increased up to 200- to 500-fold, respectively. Maximum schedule-dependent synergism was observed at a drug-scheduling interval of 2 hr; schedule-dependent synergism decreased as the interval between drugs was increased beyond 2 hr. Schedule-dependent synergism was not observed when the same drug combinations were given in reversed order. Drug-induced changes in the DNA histogram were not seen until 5 hr after HU exposure and 8 hr after ara-C exposure. Thus, the schedule-dependent synergism between ADR and either HU or ara-C cannot be explained by cell cycle blockade with synchronization of cells in S phase.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Hematology-Oncology Section, Department of Medicine, The Medical College of Wisconsin, 8700 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wis. 53226.

Received 3/17/81. Accepted 7/ 1/81.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Kudoh, M. Ramanna, R. Ravatn, A. G. Elkahloun, M. L. Bittner, P. S. Meltzer, J. M. Trent, W. S. Dalton, and K.-V. Chin
Monitoring the Expression Profiles of Doxorubicin-induced and Doxorubicin-resistant Cancer Cells by cDNA Microarray
Cancer Res., August 1, 2000; 60(15): 4161 - 4166.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1981 by the American Association for Cancer Research.