Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 41, 4752-4766, November 1, 1981]
© 1981 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greaves, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greaves, M. F.

Analysis of the Clinical and Biological Significance of Lymphoid Phenotypes in Acute Leukemia1

Melvyn F. Greaves

Membrane Immunology Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, England

Analysis of leukemic cell phenotypes using cell surface antigens and various enzymes indicates that acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a biologically heterogeneous disease consisting of four major subclasses with additional subsets existing within these subclasses. These different types of ALL appear to reflect sequential stages of early lymphocyte ontogeny.

There is a strong association between cell phenotype and first remission duration in ALL (p trend < 0.0001) and an equally strong correlation between remission duration and white blood cell count at presentation. If common ALL and thymic ALL (T-ALL) are compared after adjustment of white blood cell counts, then the prognostic differences between these two major subclasses almost disappear (p = 0.38).

It is suggested, therefore, that an immunological (and enzymatic) phenotype of ALL subclasses may not be an independent correlate of prognosis but nevertheless is linked to other differentiation-linked features, especially growth rate and sites of clonal expansion (e.g., marrow versus thymus), which critically influence the size of the clonogenic leukemic population and its associated evolutionary status with respect to drug-resistant mutants at the time of diagnosis and introduction of therapy.

An extensive library of monoclonal antibodies has been used to further define the phenotypic heterogeneity of T- and non-T ALL. Several of the antigenic structures identified by these monoclonal antibodies have been isolated and characterized. T-ALL can be dissected into several subsets corresponding to stages of intrathymic differentiation. Non-T ALL (null-ALL, common ALL, and B-ALL) all have a phenotype indicative of B-lineage affiliation indicating that "non-T, non-B" ALL may originate from B-cell precursors in bone marrow. A cell type is identified in normal bone marrow which has the same identical monoclonal antibody-defined phenotype as common ALL and may provide the target cell for this disease.

1 Presented at the Conference on Cell Markers in Acute Leukemia, March 4 and 5, 1980, Bethesda, MD. Work in the author's laboratory (1973–1980) was supported by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1981 by the American Association for Cancer Research.