Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 41, 376-379, February 1, 1981]
© 1981 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Au, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Loo, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Au, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Loo, T. L.

Comparative Structure-Genotoxicity Study of Three Aminoanthraquinone Drugs and Doxorubicin1

William W. Au2, Mary Ann Butler, Thomas S. Matney and Ti Li Loo

Departments of Cell Biology [W. W. A.] and Developmental Therapeutics [T. L. L.], The University of Texas System Cancer Center M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, and The University of Texas Health Science Center Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences [M. A. B., T. S. M.], Houston, Texas 77030

Two aminoanthraquinone analogs 1,4-bis{2-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]ethylamino}-9,10-anthracenedione (HAQ) and 1,4-dihydroxy-5,8-bis{2-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]ethylamino}-9,10-anthracenedione (DHAQ) have been shown to possess similar therapeutic activities against experimental tumors but different toxicities to the animals. In this study, the genotoxic effects of these two drugs and a new analog, 1,4-dihydroxy-5,8-bis{2-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]ethylamino}-9,10-anthracenedione diacetate, were analyzed by using mammalian cell cytogenetic assays (chromosome breakage and sister chromatid exchanges) as well as bacterial mutagenesis assays. The experimental therapeutic activities of these drugs in vivo correlated well with their in vitro genetic toxicities as revealed by cytogenetic assays; i.e., the drug with the highest therapeutic activity (DHAQ) was most active in inducing chromosome damage. DHAQ was also more genotoxic than Adriamycin. In cytogenetic assays, the activities of all drugs were reduced to different degrees in the presence of a S-9 metabolic system.

Discrepancies were observed between results obtained from cytogenetic assays and those from mutagenesis assays. Whereas DHAQ was most active in cytogenetic studies, Adriamycin was most mutagenic or toxic. HAQ was least active cytogenetically, and this activity was not changed appreciably in the presence of metabolic enzymes. However, it was metabolically activated to a bacterial mutagen. Our studies suggest that the cytogenetic and mutagenesis assays may be sensitive to the activities of different agents and of different moieties of the same agent. The application of short-term in vitro assays to identify the chemical structures responsible for genetic toxicity and for therapeutic activities in vivo may lead to the better understanding of drug activities and to the development of more effective drugs.

1 This study is supported in part by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Grant ES-01304, National Cancer Institute Contract N01-CM-87185, and Department of Energy Contracts DE-AS05 and 76EV-04024.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 7/ 7/80. Accepted 10/16/80.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
J. H. Doroshow, T. W. Synold, G. Somlo, S. A. Akman, and E. Gajewski
Oxidative DNA base modifications in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients treated with high-dose infusional doxorubicin
Blood, May 1, 2001; 97(9): 2839 - 2845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1981 by the American Association for Cancer Research.