Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 41, 3095-3099, August 1, 1981]
© 1981 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Heidelberger, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Heidelberger, C.

Oncogenic Transformation and Mutation of C3H/10T1/2 Clone 8 Mouse Embryo Fibroblasts by Alkylating Agents1

A. R. Peterson2, Joseph R. Landolph, H. Peterson, C. Paul Spears and Charles Heidelberger

University of Southern California Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Research Laboratory, Los Angeles, California 90033

Two-hr treatments with N-methyl- and N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidines and ethyl methanesulfonate induced ouabain-resistant mutants in C3H/10T1/2 cells. The alkylnitronitrosoguanidines gave linear dose-response curves and were more potent mutagens than were ethyl methanesulfonate and methyl methanesulfonate. These differences in potency were largely due to differences in the half-lives of the alkylating agents in culture medium. Differences in mutation frequencies at equitoxic concentrations of the alkylating agents are considered to reflect differences in the chemical mechanisms of alkylation and mutagenesis by the compounds. However, the frequencies of mutations produced at equitoxic concentrations were not uniformly associated with the nucleophilic selectivities of the compounds as expressed by their published Swain-Scott substrate constants. Whether or not followed by repeated replating, the yield of oncogenically transformed foci of asynchronous cells after treatment with the alkylating agents was so low that we could not obtain dose-response curves, and the yield may not be significant. By contrast, in previous experiments with N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidines and polycyclic hydrocarbons in Syrian hamster embryo fibroblasts and with ultraviolet light and polycyclic hydrocarbons in C3H/10T1/2 cells, transformation occurred to an equal or greater extent than mutation measured in the same cells.

1 Supported by Grant CA-21036 from the National Cancer Institute.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 10/10/80. Accepted 5/ 7/81.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1981 by the American Association for Cancer Research.