Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  09 AM Call for Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 42, 540-549, February 1, 1982]
© 1982 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, B.
Right arrow Articles by Saffer, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, B.
Right arrow Articles by Saffer, E. A.

Fluoresceinated Estrone Binding by Human and Mouse Breast Cancer Cells1

Bernard Fisher2, Nurten Gunduz3, Shu Zheng4 and Elizabeth A. Saffer

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261

A proportion of single, intact, viable cells derived from mouse and human breast cancers, when incubated with 17-fluoresceinated estrone, displayed fluorescence in all instances. The percentage of cells which were marker positive in mouse mammary tumors was remarkably uniform (~=35%), whereas in human breast cancers, it varied considerably (3 to 58%). While fluorescence of the entire cell most commonly occurred, staining of either the nucleus or the cytoplasm was observed frequently. Mouse uterus and liver were also marker positive. The proportion of such cells decreased in incidence following in vitro incubation with estradiol and tamoxifen or following administration of tamoxifen prior to tissue removal, findings indicative of 17-fluoresceinated estrone binding to estrogen receptor (ER). A variety of incubation times and temperatures and the use of ligand concentrations between 10-10 and 10-5 M failed to alter the proportion of marker-positive cells present in tumor. The latter indicates that nonspecific binding, should it occur as a consequence of high concentrations of ligand, is limited to cells containing ER. Consequently, the conclusion by others that nonspecific binding by cytochemical methods (should it occur) destroys the efficacy of the procedure as an indicator of patient prognosis or as a predictor of response to therapy may be unjustified, since nonspecific binding fails to alter results obtained by the cytochemical method.

When tumor ER values obtained biochemically were compared to the proportions of marker-positive cells in the same tumors, no direct quantitative relationship was evident. Consideration is given as to why such a lack of correlation does not of necessity indicate that one or the other method is inappropriate. Only if all marker cells possessed the same number of ER binding sites would a direct relationship between the two methods be apt to occur. Despite lack of a quantitative correlation, it was found that 81% of tumors with ER values of 10 to 99 fmol were associated with >10% marker-positive cells. The poorest association (39%) involved tumors with negative or borderline ER or those having inordinately high ER values, e.g., 412, >700 fmol (56%). Marker-positive cells ranged between 20 and 51% in the former and <10% in the latter. Experience with the cytochemical method as used in the present studies leads us to conclude that this is a technique which may be readily and rapidly carried out and is one which deserves more widespread evaluation. Since standard biochemical methods determine total ER in tumor cytosol and since cytochemical techniques measure the porportion of cells containing ER, the two are complimentary. When used simultaneously, they may provide more definitive information than is obtainable from either alone.

1 Supported by USPHS Grants CA-26004 and CA-14972 from the National Cancer Institute.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at 914 Scaife Hall, University of Pittsburgh, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, Pa. 15261.

3 Recipient of an award provided by the International Cancer Research Technology Transfer with the International Union Against Cancer.

4 Visiting scholar from Zhejiang Medical University, Hangzhou, China.

Received 7/27/81. Accepted 10/26/81.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J BiochemHome page
D. Asai, T. Tokunaga, K. Kondo, T. Kawaguchi, S. Takayanagi, T. Shinmyozu, M. Nakai, Y. Yakabe, and Y. Shimohigashi
Direct Measure of Fluorescence Intensity for Efficient Receptor-binding Assay: Conjugates of Ethinylcarboxyestradiol and 5(and 6)-Carboxyfluorescein via {alpha},{omega}-Diaminoalkanes as a Tracer for Estrogen Receptor
J. Biochem., June 1, 2008; 143(6): 781 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
P. A. Wood, K. Bove, S. You, A. Chambers, and W. J.M. Hrushesky
Cancer growth and spread are saltatory and phase-locked to the reproductive cycle through mediators of angiogenesis
Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2005; 4(7): 1065 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1982 by the American Association for Cancer Research.