Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010  EMT and Cancer Progression and Treatment
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 43, 88-96, January 1, 1983]
© 1983 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yun, K.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yun, K.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, R. E.

Biological Mechanisms of Phorbol Myristate Acetate-induced Inhibition of Proadipocyte Differentiation1

Kankatsu Yun and Robert E. Scott2

Section of Experimental Pathology, Departments of Pathology and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905

The differentiation of murine proadipocytes can be induced by two different methods: 1.) by culture of high-density proadipocytes in medium containing high concentrations of serum to which is added a variety of hormones and 2.) by culture of low-density proadipocytes in heparinized medium containing only human plasma. Phorbol myristate acetate influences differentiation in both culture systems, but the biological mechanisms by which phorbol myristate exerts its effect have not been established previously. In this regard, we have recently shown that five distinct steps mediate the integrated control of proadipocyte proliferation and differentiation (J. Cell Biol., 94: 400, 1982). Three steps are involved in the differentiation process: (a) growth arrest at a distinct state in the G1 phase of the cell cycle (GD); (b) nonterminal differentiation; and (c) terminal differentiation. Two steps antagonize the differentiation process and cause proliferation. These are (a) induction of loss of the differentiated phenotype and (b) reinitiation of proliferation. In this paper, we have therefore examined the effects of the tumor promoter phorbol myristate acetate on each step of integrated control of proliferation and differentiation in high- and low-density proadipocytes. The results show that in the high-density system, phorbol myristate acetate can have the following effects under appropriate experimental conditions. It can: (a) block growth arrest at GD; (b) inhibit nonterminal differentiation; (c) promote loss of the differentiated phenotype; and (d) promote the proliferation of GD-arrested cells. In the low-density system by contrast, phorbol myristate acetate (a) does not block GD arrest and (b) does not block nonterminal differentiation but (c) does promote loss of the differentiated phenotype and (d) does promote the proliferation of GD-arrested cells. These results show that the mechanisms by which phorbol myristate acetate affects differentiation are significantly influenced by a variety of factors which include changes in the culture medium, cell density, and cell-cell contact. Therefore, attempts to correlate general effects of phorbol myristate acetate on the control of cell proliferation and differentiation with its action as a tumor promoter may not be justified. We suggest that only actions of phorbol myristate acetate which selectively affect initiated cells should be considered to be relevant to the mechanisms of promotion of carcinogenesis.

1 This research was supported in part by NIH Grant CA 28240 and by the Mayo Foundation to R. E. S.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 5/12/82. Accepted 10/ 8/82.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. Smyth, R. Sparks, and W Wharton
Proadipocyte cell lines: models of cellular proliferation and differentiation
J. Cell Sci., January 9, 1993; 106(1): 1 - 9.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1983 by the American Association for Cancer Research.