Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 43, 1138-1144, March 1, 1983]
© 1983 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson-Herren, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson-Herren, L.

Tumor Dependence of Observed Thymidine Index as a Function of Emulsion Exposure1

Harris H. Lloyd2 and Linda Simpson-Herren

Kettering-Meyer Laboratory, Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, Alabama 35255

The graphs of observed pulse thymidine index against duration of emulsion exposure for seven experimental tumor systems have been observed to exhibit significant differences; either they were parallel and displaced, or they were nonparallel. The immediate practical consequence of this phenomenon is that identical emulsion exposure times, other experimental conditions being equal, may not be sufficient to provide valid comparison of thymidine indices among tumors. A mathematical model is described which relates observed autoradiographic labeling index to the distribution of radioactive atoms among individual cells that initially incorporate labeled material. Two distributions for uptake are considered, and the results are compared. One model assumes uniform uptake, and the other assumes that the number of radioactive atoms among cells acquiring label follows a {gamma} distribution. The {gamma}-distributed uptake model fits the observed thymidine index data for the seven tumors and may be expressed as Lj(t) = a[1 – Qj(1 + bt)u] where Lj(t) is the labeling index for emulsion exposure duration of t, Qj is a polynomial, and a, b, and u are adjustable parameters. The counting threshold for scoring a cell as labeled is j and for j = 1, Q1 = 1. The model indicates that the labeling index should increase with the duration of emulsion exposure and that this increase is related to the proportion of "lightly" labeled cells. The parameter a is the maximum expected labeling index, and an estimate of this parameter should theoretically be independent of emulsion exposure time.

1 Supported by Contracts N01-CM-43756 and N01-CM-97309 from Drug Research and Development, Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, and Grant 1-R01-CA-25313-01 from National Cancer Institute, NIH. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Presented in part at the 68th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, Denver, Colo., May 18 to 21, 1977 (12).

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed at Southern Research Institute, 2000 Ninth Avenue, South, P.O. Box 3307-A, Birmingham, Ala. 35255.

Received 6/27/80. Accepted 11/ 5/82.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1983 by the American Association for Cancer Research.