Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  09 AM Call for Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 43, 3998-4006, September 1, 1983]
© 1983 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, I. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, I. W.

Cell Proliferation Kinetics of MCF-7 Human Mammary Carcinoma Cells in Culture and Effects of Tamoxifen on Exponentially Growing and Plateau-Phase Cells1

Robert L. Sutherland2, Rosemary E. Hall and Ian W. Taylor

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research (Sydney Branch), University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia

MCF-7 human mammary carcinoma cells were inoculated into 150-sq cm flasks at 3 x 105 cells/flask, and after a lag period of about 48 hr, these cells grew exponentially for 5 days with a mean population doubling time of about 24 hr. During exponential growth, 80 to 90% of cells were in the "rapidly cycling" pool, the clonogenic fraction was 50 to 60%, and the mean percentage of cells in the G0–G1, S, and G2 + M phases of the cell cycle was 48.9 ± 0.6% (S.E.), 39.4 ± 0.6%, and 11.6 ± 0.3%, respectively. These parameters changed rapidly between Days 7 and 13 when plateau phase was reached. Between Days 13 and 18, 74.8 ± 0.7% of cells were in G0–G1, 15.3 ± 0.4% were in S, and 9.8 ± 0.6% were in G2 + M phase. Only about 30% of these cells were cycling rapidly, and the clonogenic fraction had fallen to less than 10%.

Tamoxifen induced a dose-dependent decrease in the growth rate of exponentially growing cells, which was accompanied by a dose-dependent increase in percentage of G0–G1-phase cells, and a decline in percentage of S-phase cells. At doses >=10 µM, a 24-hr pulse of tamoxifen was cytotoxic to exponentially growing cells. Plateau-phase cells were less sensitive to these effects of tamoxifen.

In an attempt to define the kinetic basis of the G0–G1 accumulation induced by tamoxifen, asynchronous MCF-7 cells were pretreated for 42 hr with various doses of tamoxifen, and the rate of efflux of cells from the G0–G1 phase of the cell cycle was assessed by blocking their reentry into G1 with ICRF 159. Following treatment of control cultures with ICRF 159, two populations of cells were distinguished by their rates of efflux from G0–G1 phase. The majority of cells left G0–G1 rapidly with a mean t1/2 of 2.3 hr ("rapidly cycling" cells). However, about 18% of cells had a much slower rate of exit with a mean t1/2 of about 30 hr ("slowly cycling" cells). Pretreatment with tamoxifen resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in the proportion of rapidly cycling cells and an increase in the proportion of cells with slow G1 transit times. Although this appeared to be the predominant effect, tamoxifen also decreased the rate at which the slowly cycling cells traversed G1. Simultaneous treatment with estradiol returned these parameters to control values at doses of tamoxifen ≤5 µM, partially reversed the effect of 7.5 µM tamoxifen, but was without effect on the arrest of cell cycle progression induced by 10 µM tamoxifen. It is concluded that cells accumulate in G0–G1 following tamoxifen treatment due to an increase in the proportion of slowly cycling cells at the expense of a population of rapidly cycling cells, which appear to be relatively uninfluenced by the drug.

1 Presented in part at a UCLA Symposium, "Rational Basis for Chemotherapy," Keystone, Colo., 1982 (36).

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 12/28/82. Accepted 5/20/83.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Naresh, A. D. Thor, S. M. Edgerton, K. C. Torkko, R. Kumar, and F. E. Jones
The HER4/4ICD Estrogen Receptor Coactivator and BH3-Only Protein Is an Effector of Tamoxifen-Induced Apoptosis
Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 68(15): 6387 - 6395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
Y. M. Shah, M. Al-Dhaheri, Y. Dong, C. Ip, F. E. Jones, and B. G. Rowan
Selenium disrupts estrogen receptor {alpha} signaling and potentiates tamoxifen antagonism in endometrial cancer cells and tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2005; 4(8): 1239 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Fritah, C. Saucier, J. Mester, G. Redeuilh, and M. Sabbah
p21WAF1/CIP1 Selectively Controls the Transcriptional Activity of Estrogen Receptor {alpha}
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2005; 25(6): 2419 - 2430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
F Gadal, A Starzec, C Bozic, C Pillot-Brochet, S Malinge, V Ozanne, J Vicenzi, L Buffat, G Perret, F Iris, et al.
Integrative analysis of gene expression patterns predicts specific modulations of defined cell functions by estrogen and tamoxifen in MCF7 breast cancer cells
J. Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2005; 34(1): 61 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. J. Pierce, L. F. Hutchins, S. R. Green, D. L. Lew, J. R. Gralow, R. B. Livingston, C. K. Osborne, and K. S. Albain
Sequencing of Tamoxifen and Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2005; 23(1): 24 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. H. Shen, Y. Yin, S. R. Broussard, R. H. McCusker, G. G. Freund, R. Dantzer, and K. W. Kelley
Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} Inhibits Cyclin A Expression and Retinoblastoma Hyperphosphorylation Triggered by Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Induction of New E2F-1 Synthesis
J. Biol. Chem., February 27, 2004; 279(9): 7438 - 7446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Thiantanawat, B. J. Long, and A. M. Brodie
Signaling Pathways of Apoptosis Activated by Aromatase Inhibitors and Antiestrogens
Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 63(22): 8037 - 8050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
B. D. Boyan, V. L. Sylvia, T. Frambach, C. H. Lohmann, J. Dietl, D. D. Dean, and Z. Schwartz
Estrogen-Dependent Rapid Activation of Protein Kinase C in Estrogen Receptor-Positive MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells and Estrogen Receptor-Negative HCC38 Cells Is Membrane-Mediated and Inhibited by Tamoxifen
Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 1812 - 1824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Hui, G. L. Finney, J. S. Carroll, C. S. L. Lee, E. A. Musgrove, and R. L. Sutherland
Constitutive Overexpression of Cyclin D1 but not Cyclin E Confers Acute Resistance to Antiestrogens in T-47D Breast Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., December 1, 2002; 62(23): 6916 - 6923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. K. C. Teo, H. K. Oh, R. B. Ali, and B. F. L. Li
The Modified Human DNA Repair Enzyme O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Is a Negative Regulator of Estrogen Receptor-Mediated Transcription upon Alkylation DNA Damage
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2001; 21(20): 7105 - 7114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
L. J. Havrilesky, C. P. McMahon, E. K. Lobenhofer, R. Whitaker, J. R. Marks, and A. Berchuck
Relationship Between Expression of Coactivators and Corepressors of Hormone Receptors and Resistance of Ovarian Cancers to Growth Regulation by Steroid Hormones
Reproductive Sciences, April 1, 2001; 8(2): 104 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. S. Foster, D. C. Henley, A. Bukovsky, P. Seth, and J. Wimalasena
Multifaceted Regulation of Cell Cycle Progression by Estrogen: Regulation of Cdk Inhibitors and Cdc25A Independent of Cyclin D1-Cdk4 Function
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2001; 21(3): 794 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Sabbah, D. Courilleau, J. Mester, and G. Redeuilh
Estrogen induction of the cyclin D1 promoter: Involvement of a cAMP response-like element
PNAS, September 28, 1999; 96(20): 11217 - 11222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
G. Lazennec, J. L. Alcorn, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen
Adenovirus-Mediated Delivery of a Dominant Negative Estrogen Receptor Gene Abrogates Estrogen-Stimulated Gene Expression and Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 1999; 13(6): 969 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
O. W. J. Prall, E. M. Rogan, E. A. Musgrove, C. K. W. Watts, and R. L. Sutherland
c-Myc or Cyclin D1 Mimics Estrogen Effects on Cyclin E-Cdk2 Activation and Cell Cycle Reentry
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 1998; 18(8): 4499 - 4508.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
J. I. Macgregor and V. C. Jordan
Basic Guide to the Mechanisms of Antiestrogen Action
Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 1998; 50(2): 151 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. H. D. Nguyen, I. M. Hussaini, and S. L. Gonias
Binding of Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator to Its Receptor in MCF-7 Cells Activates Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase 1 and 2 Which Is Required for Increased Cellular Motility
J. Biol. Chem., April 3, 1998; 273(14): 8502 - 8507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. W.J. Prall, B. Sarcevic, E. A. Musgrove, C. K.W. Watts, and R. L. Sutherland
Estrogen-induced Activation of Cdk4 and Cdk2 during G1-S Phase Progression Is Accompanied by Increased Cyclin D1 Expression and Decreased Cyclin-dependent Kinase Inhibitor Association with Cyclin E-Cdk2
J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 1997; 272(16): 10882 - 10894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. S. Carroll, O. W. J. Prall, E. A. Musgrove, and R. L. Sutherland
A Pure Estrogen Antagonist Inhibits Cyclin E-Cdk2 Activity in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells and Induces Accumulation of p130-E2F4 Complexes Characteristic of Quiescence
J. Biol. Chem., December 1, 2000; 275(49): 38221 - 38229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Lai, B. Sarcevic, O. W. J. Prall, and R. L. Sutherland
Insulin/Insulin-like Growth Factor-I and Estrogen Cooperate to Stimulate Cyclin E-Cdk2 Activation and Cell Cycle Progression in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells through Differential Regulation of Cyclin E and p21WAF1/Cip1
J. Biol. Chem., July 6, 2001; 276(28): 25823 - 25833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1983 by the American Association for Cancer Research.