Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 44, 144-148, January 1, 1984]
© 1984 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Glaubiger, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ramu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Glaubiger, D.

Reversal of Acquired Resistance to Doxorubicin in P388 Murine Leukemia Cells by Perhexiline Maleate1

A. Ramu2, Z. Fuks, S. Gatt and D. Glaubiger

Department of Radiation and Clinical Oncology, Hadassah University Hospital, P. O. Box 12000, Jerusalem, Israel 91120 [A. R., Z. F.]; Laboratory of Neurochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel 91010 [S. G.]; and Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20205 [D. G.]

The effects of perhexiline maleate on growth and drug sensitivity were studied in the P388 murine leukemia cell line and in an anthracycline-resistant subline (P388/ADR). At noninhibitory concentrations, perhexiline maleate markedly increased the sensitivity of P388/ADR cells to doxorubicin but did not have such an effect on anthracycline-sensitive cells.

The effects of perhexiline maleate on P388/ADR cells were reversible. Perhexiline maleate also increased the accumulation of another anthracycline, daunorubicin, in P388/ADR cells but did not increase its accumulation in the anthracycline-sensitive cells.

Perhexiline maleate did not affect the sensitivity of either cell line to methotrexate or to 6-mercaptopurine. However, its effects on the sensitivity and on drug accumulation of vinblastine, a drug to which P388/ADR cells are cross-resistant, were similar to those observed for the anthracyclines.

Although perhexiline maleate has been reported to be a calcium antagonist in other systems, our data do not suggest that this mechanism is involved in its enhancement of the sensitivity of P388/ADR cells to doxorubicin. We suggest instead that this effect might be associated with alterations of cell lipid metabolism induced by perhexiline maleate.

1 This work was supported by grants from the Joint Research Fund of the Hebrew University and Hadassah and from the Israel Cancer Research Fund.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 3/25/83. Accepted 10/ 3/83.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1984 by the American Association for Cancer Research.