Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 44, 4263-4266, October 1, 1984]
© 1984 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uadia, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ghose, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uadia, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ghose, T.

Tumor and Tissue Distribution of a Methotrexate-Anti-EL4 Immunoglobulin Conjugate in EL4 Lymphoma-bearing Mice1

Patrick Uadia2, A. Huntley Blair and Tarunendu Ghose3

Departments of Biochemistry [P. U., A. H. B.] and Pathology [T. G.], Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4H7, Canada

The uptake and tissue distribution of [3H]methotrexate ([3H]MTX) at doses of 5 mg/kg i.p. either free or linked to anti-EL4 immunoglobulin G (AELG) or normal rabbit globulin (NRG) was studied in EL4 lymphoma-bearing C57BL/6J mice. When the uptakes of MTX-AELG, MTX-NRG, and free MTX were assayed as cell-associated 3H activity, comparison 3 hr after administration showed that uptake of MTX administered as the AELG conjugate was 2.5 times the uptake of MTX administered as the NRG conjugate and 6 times the uptake of MTX administered free. In contrast to the difference in the uptake of MTX-AELG and MTX-NRG by tumor cells, the pattern of uptake in all the other tissues studied was generally similar for the two conjugates. Conjugated MTX persisted in all tissues and serum and ascites fluid, whereas free MTX declined rapidly after reaching peak levels around 1 hr, except in EL4 cells where 45% was retained at 24 hr. The levels of intracellular MTX after administration of these three agents exceeded the intracellular dihydrofolate reductase level and correlated with the relative tumor-inhibitory effect in vivo of the agent (MTX-AELG > MTX-NRG > MTX).

1 Supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada.

2 Recipient of a fellowship from the University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 12/21/83. Accepted 6/22/84.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Bioactive and Compatible PolymersHome page
N. Umemoto, Y. Kato, and T. Hara
Review : Molecular Design of Methotrexate-Antibody Conjugates for Targeted Cancer Treatment
Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, January 1, 1992; 7(2): 191 - 219.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1984 by the American Association for Cancer Research.