Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 44, 2803-2806, July 1, 1984]
© 1984 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kokoska, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kokoska, S.

Effect of an Inorganic and Organic Form of Dietary Selenium on the Promotional Stage of Mammary Carcinogenesis in the Rat1

Henry J. Thompson2, L. David Meeker and Stephen Kokoska

Departments of Animal and Nutritional Sciences [H. J. T.] and Mathematics [L. D. M., S. K.], University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824

The relative effectiveness of either sodium selenite or selenomethionine in the inhibition of mammary carcinogenesis was studied in virgin female Sprague-Dawley rats. In one experiment, rats were given 50 mg of 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea per kg of body weight s.c. at 50 days of age. Beginning 7 days post-1-methyl-1-nitrosourea, they were assigned to a basal diet containing 0.1 ppm of selenium or basal diet supplemented to contain either 4, 5, or 6 ppm of selenium as sodium selenite or 5 or 6 ppm of selenium as selenomethionine. Selenium treatment was continued until termination of the study 135 days after 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea treatment. Sodium selenite, at the 5-ppm level, was the most effective chemopreventive agent. The highest level of selenomethionine (6 ppm) caused grossly apparent liver damage. No liver damage was noted in sodium selenite-treated rats. In a second experiment, rats were given 5 mg of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene at 50 days of age. Beginning 7 days after 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene treatment, rats were assigned randomly to the control group or to one of two selenium treatment groups receiving either 3.4 ppm of selenium as sodium selenite or 3.4 ppm as selenomethionine in their drinking water. Selenium supplementation was continued throughout the study until its termination at 111 days postcarcinogen. Sodium selenite significantly reduced cancer incidence and the average number of cancers per rat. Treatment with selenomethionine was less effective and caused severe liver damage. Although both sodium selenite and selenomethionine can inhibit some aspect of the postinitiation stage(s) of mammary carcinogenesis, selenium provided as sodium selenite was the more effective and less toxic of the two chemicals. Increasing the dose of sodium selenite above 5 ppm did not enhance the inhibitory activity of selenium.

1 Supported by USPHS Grant CA 28109 from the National Cancer Institute. Scientific Contribution 1228 from the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at the Human Nutrition Center, Colovos Road, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824.

Received 3/10/83. Accepted 3/29/84.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
D. N. Stemm, J. C. Tharappel, H.-J. Lehmler, C. Srinivasan, J. S. Morris, V. L. Spate, L. W. Robertson, B. T. Spear, and H. P. Glauert
Effect of Dietary Selenium on the Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis by 3,3', 4,4'-Tetrachlorobiphenyl and 2,2', 4,4', 5,5'-Hexachlorobiphenyl
Experimental Biology and Medicine, March 1, 2008; 233(3): 366 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. V. Rao, C-Q. Wang, B. Simi, J. G. Rodriguez, I. Cooma, K. El-Bayoumy, and B. S. Reddy
Chemoprevention of Colon Cancer by a Glutathione Conjugate of 1,4-Phenylenebis(methylene)selenocyanate, a Novel Organoselenium Compound with Low Toxicity
Cancer Res., May 1, 2001; 61(9): 3647 - 3652.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. D. Davis, E. O. Uthus, and J. W. Finley
Dietary Selenium and Arsenic Affect DNA Methylation In Vitro in Caco-2 Cells and In Vivo in Rat Liver and Colon
J. Nutr., December 1, 2000; 130(12): 2903 - 2909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
C. V. Rao, I. Cooma, J. G.R. Rodriguez, B. Simi, K. El-Bayoumy, and B. S. Reddy
Chemoprevention of familial adenomatous polyposis development in the APCmin mouse model by 1,4-phenylene bis(methylene)selenocyanate
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2000; 21(4): 617 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. D. Davis, Y. Feng, D. W. Hein, and J. W. Finley
The Chemical Form of Selenium Influences 3,2'-Dimethyl-4-aminobiphenyl-DNA Adduct Formation in Rat Colon
J. Nutr., January 1, 1999; 129(1): 63 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1984 by the American Association for Cancer Research.