Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 44, 3806-3811, September 1, 1984]
© 1984 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pegg, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dolan, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pegg, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dolan, M. E.

Comparison of the Rates of Repair of O6-Alkylguanines in DNA by Rat Liver and Bacterial O6-Alkylguanine-DNA Alkyltransferase1

Anthony E. Pegg2, David Scicchitano and M. Eileen Dolan

Department of Physiology and Cancer Center, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033

The rates of loss of O6-methylguanine and O6-ethylguanine from rat liver DNA were determined over a time period of 15 min to 4 hr after various doses (5 µg/kg to 2 mg/kg) of dimethylnitrosamine and diethylnitrosamine which produced total amounts of these adducts in the range of 300 to 16,000 molecules/cell. This amount is considerably less than the content of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase protein (approximately 60,000 molecules/hepatocyte), and during the time period studied, the adducts were found to be lost with pseudo-first order kinetics. The half-life for O6-methylguanine was 47 min. O6-Ethylguanine was removed 3.6 times more slowly with a half-life of 172 min. The ability of partially purified rat liver O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase to remove O6-methylguanine and O6-ethylguanine from [3H]alkyl-labeled DNA substrates in vitro was measured, and it was found that O6-methylguanine was removed 3.4 times more rapidly than was O6-ethylguanine. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that most, if not all, of the repair of these adducts which occurs within the first 4 hr after treatment is due to the alkyltransferase protein. Diethylnitrosamine, which is slightly more potent as a carcinogen to rat liver, produced a total amount of O6-ethylguanine of 3.7 µmol/mol guanine/mg compared to O6-methylguanine (28 µmol/mol guanine/mg) given by dimethylnitrosamine. The slower rate of loss of the ethyl adduct is not sufficient to account for this difference, and the results, therefore, support the concept that other DNA adducts (possibly O-alkylpyrimidines) contribute to the initiation of tumors by diethylnitrosamine.

Preliminary evidence that the rat liver alkyltransferase can also remove hydroxyethyl groups from DNA at a rate slower than removal of ethyl groups was also obtained. Bacterial O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase was shown to remove methyl, ethyl, and hydroxyethyl groups from the O6 position of guanine in DNA using fluorescence detection to quantitate these adducts. The bacterial protein removed methyl groups very rapidly but was much slower than the rat liver protein on the larger adducts. These results suggest that the relative rates of repair of different alkyl groups may be species specific and must be determined experimentally in the cell of interest before conclusions concerning biological effects can be drawn.

1 This work was supported by Grants CA-18137 and 1P30-18450 from the National Cancer Institute.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 2/27/84. Accepted 6/ 5/84.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
G.J.S. Jenkins, S.H. Doak, G.E. Johnson, E. Quick, E.M. Waters, and J.M. Parry
Do dose response thresholds exist for genotoxic alkylating agents?
Mutagenesis, November 1, 2005; 20(6): 389 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Skorvaga, N. D. H. Raven, and G. P. Margison
Thermostable archaeal O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferases
PNAS, June 9, 1998; 95(12): 6711 - 6715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1984 by the American Association for Cancer Research.