Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Genetics and Biology of Brain Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 45, 5240-5245, November 1, 1985]
© 1985 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bullard, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bigner, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bullard, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bigner, D. D.

Comparison of Intravenous versus Intracarotid Therapy with 1,3-Bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea in a Rat Brain Tumor Model1

Dennis E. Bullard2, Sandra H. Bigner and Darell D. Bigner

Departments of Surgery (Neurosurgery) and Pathology (Neuropathology), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Currently numerous clinical trials are in progress utilizing intracarotid (i.c.) 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) for the treatment of malignant gliomas based upon the proposed focal nature of these tumors and the assumption that the i.c. route delivers higher levels of drug to the tumor. To date, however, increased efficacy in an animal model has not been clearly demonstrated for the i.c. delivery of BCNU. We have evaluated the dose-response curve for the i.v. and i.c. administration of BCNU in a commonly utilized experimental brain tumor model, the 9L rat gliosarcoma. An initial toxicity trial utilizing the i.p. 10% lethal dose (LD10) of BCNU by the i.v. and i.c. routes failed to demonstrate any significance in toxicity between the two routes. Tumor-bearing animals were then treated on Day 15–16 after tumor inoculations with 1, 10, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of the LD10 dose by either the i.v. or the i.c. route. Both i.v. and i.c. BCNU gave maximum survival increases at 75–100% LD10 doses, and there was no therapeutic advantage seen from i.c. delivery. However, at 50% of the LD10 dose (6.65 mg/kg), triplicate experiments demonstrated that the i.c. but not the i.v. dose maintained maximum efficacy equivalent to 100% of the LD10 given either i.v. or i.c. When the dose was reduced to 25% of the LD10 dose (3.33 mg/kg), two of three experiments showed efficacy of the i.c. delivery of this lower drug dosage to be equivalent to 100% of the LD10 given i.v. or i.c. The i.v. dosage resulted in a significant reduction in survival in all three trials. At 10% of the LD10 dose (1.30 mg/kg), neither the i.v. nor the i.c. administration retained equivalent efficacy to 100% of the LD10. However, in one of two trials, the i.c. groups had statistically better survival than controls, while in neither experiment was any advantage over controls seen in the i.v. treated groups. At 1% of the LD10 dose, neither the i.v. nor the i.c. route demonstrated any therapeutic efficacy. From our data, the advantage of the i.c. delivery of BCNU in the intracranial 9L rat gliosarcoma appears to be in the fact that significantly lower dosages than those given i.v. may be utilized to achieve equivalent survival with potentially less systemic toxicity.

1 This work was supported by Grant NS 20023 and TIA Award 1 K070080-01 (D. E. B.) from NINCDS and Grants CA 11909 and CA 32672 from the National Cancer Institute.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Box 3128, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

Received 3/26/85. Revised 7/ 9/85. Accepted 8/ 5/85.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neuro Oncol DukeHome page
B. Geoerger, C.-B. Tang, A. Cesano, S. Visonneau, S. Marwaha, K. D. Judy, L. N. Sutton, D. Santoli, and P. C. Phillips
Antitumor activity of a human cytotoxic T-cell line (TALL-104) in brain tumor xenografts
Neuro-oncol, April 1, 2000; 2(2): 103 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1985 by the American Association for Cancer Research.