Cancer Research Cancer Epigenetics  Telomeres
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 45, 6078-6082, December 1, 1985]
© 1985 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitagawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitagawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, S.

Induction by X-Irradiation of Adenosine Triphosphatase-deficient Islands in the Rat Liver and Their Characterization1

Tomoyuki Kitagawa2, Kimie Nomura and Shunsaku Sasaki

Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, Tokyo 170 [T. K., K. N.] and Division of Radiation Hazards, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba 260 [S. S.], Japan

The potential of X-rays to induce preneoplastic lesions in the rat liver was studied in order to clarify the reason why X-rays are ineffective in inducing hepatocellular carcinoma in this animal. Male newborn rats at 8 or 22 days of age received whole body X-ray irradiation of 100 to 400 rads. After weaning they were fed either basal diet or a diet containing 0.05% phenobarbital as a promoter. X-rays induced numerous adenosine triphosphatase-deficient islands appearing in the liver by wk 22 of age. However, they were generally small, {gamma}-glutamyl transpeptidase-negative, and did not clearly respond to the promoting stimulus of phenobarbital. No hepatic tumors were observed by 22 mo after radiation, even in phenobarbital-treated animals. Thus the X-ray-induced enzyme-altered islands differ somewhat qualitatively from those induced by potent hepatic carcinogens and their preneoplastic potential if at all present may be very low. Similarities between these X-ray-induced lesions and some types of spontaneous enzyme-altered islands are pointed out.

1 Supported by a grant-in-aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 10/ 9/84. Revised 8/27/85. Accepted 8/29/85.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
F. Marongiu, S. Doratiotto, S. Montisci, P. Pani, and E. Laconi
Liver Repopulation and Carcinogenesis: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
Am. J. Pathol., April 1, 2008; 172(4): 857 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
G.-H. Lee
Review Article: Paradoxical Effects of Phenobarbital on Mouse Hepatocarcinogenesis
Toxicol Pathol, March 1, 2000; 28(2): 215 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1985 by the American Association for Cancer Research.