Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 45, 6147-6154, December 1, 1985]
© 1985 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welsch, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sheffield, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Welsch, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sheffield, L. G.

Influence of Dietary Fat Levels on Development and Hormone Responsiveness of the Mouse Mammary Gland1

Clifford W. Welsch2, Jane V. DeHoog, Deborah H. O'Connor and Lewis G. Sheffield

Department of Anatomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Twenty-one-day-old female BALB/c mice were divided into three groups and fed a diet containing 0, 5, and 20% fat (corn oil). Ten days prior to sacrifice, one-half of the mice were given injections daily with saline (0.9% NaCl solution), and the remaining half, with 17ß-estradiol (1 µg) and progesterone (1 mg). After 3 mo on diet and 10 days of saline or estradiol:progesterone treatments, all mice were sacrificed, and mammary glands were excised and prepared for whole-mount evaluation (No. 4 glands), [3H]thymidine-autoradiographic analysis (No. 2 glands), and organ culture analysis (No. 2 glands). Whole-mount evaluation involved a rating for ductal and alveolar development on a scale of 1 to 6. [3H]Thymidine-autoradiographic analysis consisted of determining the total number of labeled epithelial cells per anterior 3 mm of gland. Organ culture analysis consisted of placing one gland of each gland pair in basal tissue culture medium, and the contralateral gland was placed in basal medium plus mammogenic hormones. These glands were cultured for 6 days and then analyzed for development by whole-mount evaluation (scale, 1 to 6) and for epithelial area (mm2) (via computer image analysis). In saline- and estradiol:progesterone-treated mice, there was a significant linear increase in the number of [3]-thymidine-labeled mammary epithelial cells as the fat content of the diet increased from 0 to 5 to 20% (P < 0.05). In saline- and estradiol:progesterone-treated mice, mammary gland development (assessed by whole-mount evaluation) was increased as the fat content of the diet increased from 0 to 5% (P < 0.05). In saline-treated mice, no significant difference in mammae development was observed between mice fed 5 or 20% fat diets; in estradiol:progesterone-treated mice, mammae development was marginally increased in mice fed the 20% fat diet compared to mice fed the 5% fat diet (P ~ 0.07). When the mammary glands from saline- or estradiol:progesterone-treated mice were analyzed for hormone responsiveness in organ culture, the response of these glands to mammogenic hormones was significantly increased (assessed by mammae development and mammae epithelial area), as the fat content of the diet was increased from 0 to 5% (P < 0.05); as the fat content of the diet was increased from 5 to 20%, there was an increase in responsiveness to mammogenic hormones, but this increase was not as pronounced and often did not reach the 5% level of statistical probability. Thus, the results of this study provide evidence that the level of dietary fat can affect in situ mammary gland development and growth responsiveness to mammogenic hormones. The effect of dietary fat is quite striking when comparing mice fed 0 and 5% fat diets and less pronounced when comparing mice fed 5 and 20% fat diets.

1 This research was supported by USPHS Research Grant CA-37613.

2 To whom requests for reprints sould be addressed, at Department of Anatomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Received 3/14/85. Revised 8/26/85. Accepted 8/28/85.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1985 by the American Association for Cancer Research.