Cancer Research Donn Young  Genetics and Biology of Brain Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 45, 1525-1531, April 1, 1985]
© 1985 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reddel, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reddel, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, R. L.

Differential Sensitivity of Human Breast Cancer Cell Lines to the Growth-inhibitory Effects of Tamoxifen

Roger R. Reddel, Leigh C. Murphy, Rosemary E. Hall and Robert L. Sutherland1

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research (Sydney Branch), Blackburn Building, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia

In eight estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cell lines (including three sublines of MCF-7) and five ER-negative breast lines, the action of the nonsteroidal antiestrogen, tamoxifen, was studied, and the concentrations of ER and antiestrogen binding site were measured. The concentration of antiestrogen binding site was significantly [P < 0.005] greater in ER-positive cells [236,600 ± 29,900 (SE) sites/cell] than in ER-negative cell lines [66,600 ± 16,800 sites/cell].

In ER-positive cell lines, a cell cycle phase-specific growth-inhibitory effect, 20% inhibitory dose <0.1 to 1.0 µM, was seen which was shown for some representative cell lines to be estrogen reversible. Within this group of cell lines, the degree of tamoxifen-induced inhibition of growth correlated with control population doubling time, but not ER or antiestrogen binding site concentration. The changes in cell cycle kinetic parameters characteristic of all ER-positive lines were a decrease in percentage of S-phase cells and a corresponding increase in percentage of G0-G1 cells.

In all cell lines, 5 to 12.5 µM tamoxifen caused cytotoxicity, and this was shown to be estrogen-irreversible in 3 representative cell lines; moreover, estradiol synergistically enhanced the cytotoxic effects of tamoxifen under some experimental conditions. The cell cycle effects of tamoxifen in three ER-negative cell lines (Hs0578T, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-330) were decreased proportions of G0-G1 cells with an increase in percent-ages of S and G2+M cells. These results implied that the mechanism of tamoxifen cytotoxicity may differ in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer cells. However, although the ER-negative BT-20 line was much less sensitive to tamoxifen than were the ER-positive cells, growth inhibition and cytotoxicity in this line were associated with a slight decrease in percentage of S-phase cells.

These results confirm that ER-positive breast cancer cells are more sensitive (4- to >75-fold) than ER-negative breast cells to the growth-inhibitory effects of tamoxifen and demonstrate that, in all ER-positive cells, growth inhibition and cytotoxicity are accompanied by characteristic changes in cell cycle kinetic parameters. In contrast, different mechanisms may be involved in the effects of tamoxifen on different ER-negative cell lines.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 11/ 2/83. Revised 10/ 1/84. Revised 12/ 5/84. Accepted 12/27/84.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
P.-L. Tremblay, F. Berthod, L. Germain, and F. A. Auger
In Vitro Evaluation of the Angiostatic Potential of Drugs Using an Endothelialized Tissue-Engineered Connective Tissue
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2005; 315(2): 510 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
O. Boijoux, C. Boutonnet, C. Giamarchi, G. Favre, S. Vagner, and J. C. Faye
Chemical-Based Translational Induction of Luciferase Expression: An Efficient Tool for in Vivo Screening of Protein Farnesylation Inhibitors
Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2005; 67(6): 1829 - 1833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
K. T. Robbins, T. P. Vu, A. Diaz, and N. M. Varki
Growth Effects of Tamoxifen and Estradiol on Laryngeal Carcinoma Cell Lines
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, November 1, 1994; 120(11): 1261 - 1266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
A. Shapira, E. Virolainen, J. J. Jameson, S. J. Ossakow, and T. E. Carey
Growth Inhibition of Laryngeal UM-SCC Cell Lines by Tamoxifen: Comparison With Effects on the MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cell Line
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, November 1, 1986; 112(11): 1151 - 1158.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1985 by the American Association for Cancer Research.