| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305 [G. M. H., E. C. S., B. W., L. G.], and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143 [G. C. L.]
Several organic solvents were shown to induce thermotolerance. These included: aliphatic alcohols (ethanol to octanol); local anesthetics; dimethyl sulfoxide; and dimethyl formamide. The minimum concentrations of the various alcohols required to induce tolerance were similar to the threshold doses for cytotoxicity. When only intramembrane concentrations were considered (by multiplying by the appropriate membrane:buffer partition coefficient), then the alcohols' threshold dose to induce tolerance was only mildly a function of carbon number. The efficiency increased almost linearly with a membrane dose from propanol to pentanol, but was slightly reduced for octanol. All alcohols induced tolerance rapidly (within a few hours after 30-min exposure), but the thermotolerance ratio decreased with increasing carbon number.
Of the three anesthetics examined, lidocaine was a highly efficient inducer, procaine less so, and tetracaine did not induce tolerance even at a concentration mildly cytotoxic. Dimethyl sulfoxide and dimethyl formamide induced tolerance without cytotoxicity, but the kinetics of doing so was different from that seen with the other solvents. Only cells exposed to these watersoluble agents for 18 h or longer showed evidence of induced heat resistance.
Our results indicate that membranes likely are the site for the initiation of solvent-induced cell killing and thermotolerance. The minimum dose of induction may be related to the degree of disorder induced by the individual alcohol, but the amount of tolerance induced is inversely related to this. The data on the effects of local anesthetics show that neither their common functional mode of inhibiting nerve transmission nor their similar level of cytotoxicity insures similar efficiency as tolerance inducers. Results with dimethyl sulfoxide and dimethyl formamide suggest that tolerance can be induced by more than one mechanism, or alternately, that a multiple-step mechanism can be activated at different points along this pathway.
We also measured heat shock protein synthesis after several treatments; efficient inducers of thermotolerance also induced these proteins.
1 This work was supported by Grants CA-04542, CA-31397, and CA-32827 from the National Cancer Institute.
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.
Received 10/ 9/84. Revised 4/30/85. Accepted 5/17/85.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. G. Chung, M. R.W. Mann, M. S. Bartolomei, and K. E. Latham Nuclear-Cytoplasmic "Tug of War" During Cloning: Effects of Somatic Cell Nuclei on Culture Medium Preferences of Preimplantation Cloned Mouse Embryos Biol Reprod, April 1, 2002; 66(4): 1178 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. F. Salminen Jr., R. Voellmy, and S. M. Roberts Effect of N-Acetylcysteine on Heat Shock Protein Induction by Acetaminophen in Mouse Liver J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 1998; 286(1): 519 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |