Cancer Research Landon Prizes for Basic and Translational Cancer Research  AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 46, 4938-4941, October 1, 1986]
© 1986 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manni, A.
Right arrow Articles by Luk, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manni, A.
Right arrow Articles by Luk, G.

Polyamines and Hormonal Regulation of N-Nitrosomethylurea-induced Rat Mammary Tumor Growth in Vivo1

Andrea Manni, Carol Wright, Lawrence Demers and Gordon Luk

Departments of Medicine [A. M., C. W.] and Pathology [L. D.], The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, and The Oncology Center and Department of Medicine [G. L.], The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205

We have observed that polyamines play an essential role in the expression of hormonal action on the growth of the N-nitrosomethylurea-induced mammary tumor cultured in soft agar. Since polyamine levels cannot be measured in this system, we could not determine whether tumor polyamine pools are under endocrine control. To test this hypothesis, the following experiments were conducted in N-nitrosomethylurea tumor-bearing rats in vivo. Both tamoxifen administration (200 µg/day) and ovariectomy produced dramatic reductions in tumor growth but neither treatment significantly altered tumor polyamine levels after either 7 or 21 days of treatment. Some decrease in tumor level of putrescine, spermidine, and spermine was observed 21 days after ovariectomy but it was not statistically significant. Exogenous administration of putrescine (300 mg/kg/day) reversed the antitumor effect of tamoxifen but did not prevent tumor regression induced by ovariectomy. This effect of putrescine was, however, variable in magnitude from experiment to experiment. To test whether the reversal of tamoxifen effect by putrescine might simply be due to interference with tamoxifen uptake by the tumor cells, we measured estrogen and progesterone receptors in the tumors of rats chronically treated with tamoxifen and tamoxifen plus putrescine. In both groups estrogen receptors are virtually undetectable, thus suggesting that putrescine had not inhibited tamoxifen entry into the cells and binding to estrogen receptors. Progesterone receptor levels were similarly high in both groups and not significantly different from control. These results indicate that at least under these experimental conditions N-nitrosomethylurea mammary tumor polyamine pools are not under ovarian hormone control. The mechanism by which putrescine reverses tamoxifen's effect remains unclear.

1 Supported in part by Grant CA 34453 and Program Project Grant No. CH40011 from NIH.

Received 4/ 3/86. Revised 6/26/86. Accepted 7/14/86.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Cancer Research.