Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Protein Translation and Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 46, 5287-5290, October 1, 1986]
© 1986 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rao, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rao, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, J. K.

Analysis of Peroxisome Proliferator-induced Preneoplastic and Neoplastic Lesions of Rat Liver for Placental Form of Glutathione S-Transferase and {gamma}-Glutamyltranspeptidase1

M. Sambasiva Rao2, Masae Tatematsu, V. Subbarao, Nobuyuki Ito and Janardan K. Reddy

Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611 [M. S. R., V. S., J. K. R.], and First Department of Pathology, Nagoya City University Medical School, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Nagoya 467, Japan [M. T., N. I.]

Structurally unrelated peroxisome proliferators induce altered areas (AA), neoplastic nodules (NN), and hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) in rats and mice. In this study we have examined several AA, NN, and HCC induced by Wy-14,643 and ciprofibrate in rats for {gamma}-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) and the placental form of glutathione S-transferase (GST-P) by histochemical and immunohistochemical procedures, respectively. In Wy-14,643-treated animals 96–100% of NN and HCC was negative for both GGT and GST-P. Eighty-seven % of the AA was negative for both GGT and GST-P, and only 2% was positive for both the marker enzymes. In ciprofibrate-treated animals 52% and 75% of AA were negative for GST-P and GGT, respectively, and 16% was positive for both the enzymes. However, a large majority of NN and HCC (more than 95%) was devoid of both these marker enzymes. Thus these studies clearly indicate that the hepatic lesions induced by peroxisome proliferators display different phenotypic properties as compared to the lesions induced by commonly used classical liver carcinogens. We conclude that GGT and GST-P are not the ideal markers for identifying AA, NN and HCC induced by peroxisome proliferators.

1 Supported by USPHS Grants CA 36130 and GM 23750, NIH.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 3/17/86. Revised 6/ 9/86. Accepted 6/26/86.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
K. Kubota, J. Soeda, R. Misawa, M. Mihara, S. Miwa, H. Ise, M. Takahashi, and S. Miyagawa
Bone marrow-derived cells fuse with hepatic oval cells but are not involved in hepatic tumorigenesis in the choline-deficient ethionine-supplemented diet rat model
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2008; 29(2): 448 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
C. Michel, C. Desdouets, M. Slaoui, K. R. Isaacs, R. A. Roberts, and E. Boitier
Diethylnitrosamine Initiation Does Not Alter Clofibric Acid Induced Hepatocarcinogenesis in the Rat
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2007; 99(1): 58 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
T. Sukata, S. Uwagawa, K. Ozaki, K. Sumida, K. Kikuchi, M. Kushida, K. Saito, K. Morimura, K. Oeda, Y. Okuno, et al.
{alpha}2-Macroglobulin: A Novel Cytochemical Marker Characterizing Preneoplastic and Neoplastic Rat Liver Lesions Negative for Hitherto Established Cytochemical Markers
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2004; 165(5): 1479 - 1488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
G.-H. Lee
Review Article: Paradoxical Effects of Phenobarbital on Mouse Hepatocarcinogenesis
Toxicol Pathol, March 1, 2000; 28(2): 215 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Kaplanski, C. J. Pauley, T. G. Griffiths, T. T. Kawabata, and B. J. Ledwith
Differentiation of Rat Oval Cells after Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {{alpha}}43
Cancer Res., February 1, 2000; 60(3): 580 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
M. A. Moore, H. Tsuda, S. Tamano, A. Hagiwara, K. Imaida, T. Shirai, and N. Ito
Commentary: Marriage of a Medium-Term Liver Model to Surrogate Markers--A Practical Approach for Risk and Benefit Assessment
Toxicol Pathol, March 1, 1999; 27(2): 237 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
S. Ito, C. Tateno, M. Tuda, and A. Yoshitake
Immunohistochemical Demonstration of the Gap Junctional Protein Connexin 32 and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen in Glutathione S-Transferase Placental Form-Negative Lesions of Rat Liver Induced by Diethylnitrosamine and Clofibrate
Toxicol Pathol, November 1, 1996; 24(6): 690 - 695.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Cancer Research.