Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 46, 6024-6028, December 1, 1986]
© 1986 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wheeler, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wheeler, G. P.

DNA Damage in Cultured L1210 Cells by 2-Haloethyl Esters of (Methylsulfonyl)methanesulfonic Acid1

Jo Ann Alexander2, Bonnie J. Bowdon and Glynn P. Wheeler

Biochemistry Department, Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, Alabama 35255-5305

The effects of the 2-chloroethyl, 2-bromoethyl, and 2-fluoroethyl esters of (methylsulfonyl)methanesulfonic acid upon the DNA of cultured L1210 cells have been measured and compared with each other and with the effects of chlorozotocin. Results obtained by the alkaline elution method indicated that, at equimolar and equitoxic concentrations, the esters caused more strand scission than chlorozotocin, but at compound concentrations that caused a 50% reduction in colony formation by cells following an exposure period of 2 h, they caused no detectable crosslinking, whereas chlorozotocin did cause cross-linking. Two in vitro experimental methods that are based upon the complexing of ethidium to calf thymus DNA also yielded data showing that, at equimolar concentrations, chlorozotocin caused cross-linking of calf thymus DNA, but the 2-chloroethyl ester did not. These results indicate that these esters might not kill cells by producing DNA-DNA cross-links.

The three esters caused qualitatively similar effects, but the fluoro esters caused less strand scission than the chloro and bromo esters, which caused about the same extent of strand scission.

1 This investigation was supported by Grant PO1-CA34200 awarded by the National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Southern Research Institute, P. O. Box 55305, Birmingham, AL 35255-5305.

Received 11/12/85. Revised 3/31/86. Revised 6/18/86. Accepted 8/ 5/86.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Cancer Research.