Cancer Research Cancer Research Funding Available  EMT and Cancer Progression and Treatment
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 46, 6054-6058, December 1, 1986]
© 1986 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vertut-Croquin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Medoff, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vertut-Croquin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Medoff, G.

Two Mechanisms of Synergism When Amphotericin B Is Used in Combination with Actinomycin D or 1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea against the Human Promyelocytic Leukemia Cell Line HL-601

Aline Vertut-Croquin2, Janina Brajtburg and Gerald Medoff3

Department of Medicine, Division of Infections Disease [A.V-C., J. B., G. M.], and the Department of Microbiology and Immunology [G. M.], Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110

The toxic effects of the combinations of amphotericin B (AmB) and actinomycin D or AmB and 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea were measured against the human promyelocytic leukemia cells HL-60. The toxicities of both drug combinations were greater than the additive toxicity of each of the drugs used singly, but the exact conditions under which synergism was achieved differed for each combination. The synergism achieved by the AmB-actinomycin combination was accompanied by an AmB-induced increase in uptake of actinomycin D by the HL-60 cells, whereas the synergism of the AmB-1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea combination could be linked to potentiation by 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea of AmB-induced oxidative injury. These results indicate that the synergism of these two drug combinations was caused by different mechanisms.

1 Supported by USPHS Grants AI16228, CA15665, AI07172, and AI07015. Some aspects of this work have already been presented (1).

2 Present address: Laboratoire de Physique et Chimie Biomoleculaire (UA CNRS 198), Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, 75252, Paris Cedex 05, France.

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 3/10/86. Revised 6/18/86. Accepted 8/ 1/86.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Cancer Research.