Cancer Research  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 46, 6156-6159, December 1, 1986]
© 1986 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tofilon, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Brock, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tofilon, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Brock, W. A.

cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum(II)-induced Sister Chromatid Exchange: An Indicator of Sensitivity and Heterogeneity in Primary Human Tumor Cell Cultures1

Philip J. Tofilon2, Charlotte M. Vines, Fraser L. Baker, Dennis F. Deen and William A. Brock

The Department of Experimental Radiotherapy, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute at Houston, Houston, Texas 77030 [P. J. T., C. M. V., W. A. B.]; LifeTrac, Irvine, California 92715 [F. L. B.]; and The Brain Tumor Research Center of the Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143 [D. F. D.]

The effect of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (cPt) on sister chromatid exchange (SCE) induction was determined in 13 human primary tumor cell cultures. Primary cultures were derived from surgical specimens of solid tumors composed of a variety of histologies. Three to 16 days after biopsy, depending on the growth rate, cultures were treated with graded concentrations of cPt for 1 h and the SCE assay was performed. SCE dose-response curves (SCEs induced per chromosome versus cPt concentration) showed a wide range in cPt sensitivities that was not dependent on histology. SCE frequency histograms showed that several of the primary cultures contained both cPt-sensitive and-resistant cells. For six of the cultures, the SCEs induced per chromosome at 15 µM cPt were plotted versus the IC90 determined from a survival assay. A line fit to those points yielded a correlation coefficient of -0.74. These results show a relationship between the activity of cPt in the SCE assay and in the survival assay, which suggests that SCE analysis may be useful for predicting cPt sensitivity. In addition, characterization of cellular heterogeneity in cPt sensitivity using the SCE assay may provide additional information useful in the prediction of tumor response to treatment.

1 Supported by NIH Grant CA-06294.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at University of Texas Cancer Center, M. D. Anderson Hospital, Experimental Radiotherapy-66, 6723 Bertner Avenue, Houston, TX 77030.

Received 6/ 6/86. Revised 8/19/86. Accepted 8/22/86.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Cancer Research.