Cancer Research AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008  AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 46, 629-632, February 1, 1986]
© 1986 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siemann, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siemann, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, S. A.

Increased Therapeutic Benefit through the Addition of Misonidazole to a Nitrosourea-Radiation Combination1

Dietmar W. Siemann2 and Sally A. Hill3

Experimental Therapeutics Division and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Cancer Center, Rochester, New York 14642

The potential therapeutic advantage of including the radiosensitizer misonidazole (MISO) in a treatment regimen combining systemic chemotherapy and localized radiotherapy was assessed in the KHT sarcoma. Tumor-bearing C3H mice were treated with 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea, administered either alone or in combination with MISO, 24 h prior to irradiating the tumors with doses ranging from 0–35 Gy. The sensitizer exposure was either a single dose of 2.5 mmol/kg or multiple injections given every 0.5 h for 8 h to maintain a sensitizer blood level of approximately 100 µg/ml. The chemotherapeutic agent was administered simultaneously with the single sensitizer dose or 3 h into the chronic sensitizer dosing schedule. Tumor response to the combined modality treatments was determined using end points of tumor regrowth delay and animal tumor-free survival. Skin reactions in the treatment field were scored as a measure of normal tissue complications. MISO, administered as a single dose in the combined modality therapy, enhanced the tumor response by a factor of ~1.8–1.9 while increasing skin reactions ~1.1- to 1.2-fold. Combining 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea with chronic MISO administration prior to irradiation increased the resultant tumor control probability 1.5- to 1.8-fold without enhancing normal tissue complications. Consequently using MISO as a chemopotentiator in a 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea-radiation combination can yield a significant therapeutic benefit.

1 Supported by USPHS Grants CA-20329 and CA-38637, awarded by the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Experimental Therapeutics Division, University of Rochester Cancer Center, 601 Elmwood Ave. Box 704, Rochester, NY 14642.

3 Present address: Gray Laboratory, Mt. Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN England.

Received 7/11/85. Revised 10/10/85. Accepted 10/14/85.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Cancer Research.