Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

[Cancer Research 46, 1608-1611, April 1, 1986]
© 1986 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elmets, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elmets, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, K. D.

Immunological Suppression in Mice Treated with Hematoporphyrin Derivative Photoradiation1

Craig A. Elmets2 and Kim D. Bowen3

Department of Dermatology, Case Western Reserve University, and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio

Hematoporphyrin derivative (HPD) is a potent photosensitizer which localizes preferentially in malignant tumors. Parenteral administration of this compound followed by irradiation with the appropriate wavelengths of light has been used for the diagnosis and treatment of various epithelial neoplasms. In this study the effects of such treatment on immunological responses were evaluated by examining the capacity of HPD and light to inhibit contact hypersensitivity to dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) in C3H mice. Pretreatment of mice with HPD photoradiation resulted in 50% suppression of contact hypersensitivity to DNFB. Inhibition of the response could be produced even when sensitization with DNFB was attempted 2 weeks after a single irradiation procedure, indicating that HPD and light-induced inhibition of contact sensitivity was a sustained phenomenon. Prior sensitization with DNFB followed by treatment with HPD and light elicited no immunosuppression. The immunosuppressive response required photoactivation of the porphyrin molecule, since mice treated with HPD alone or light alone developed little or no suppression. In adoptive transfer studies, it was shown that the immunosuppression was associated with the development of suppressor cells. These results indicate that photoradiation therapy with HPD and light can produce systemic suppression of contact hypersensitivity in mice. These data suggest that HPD photoradiation of malignant tumors may inhibit certain types of immune responses in humans.

1 This work was supported by NIH grant AM32593 and by a grant from the Robert J. Frackleton Fund of University Hospitals of Cleveland.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 2074 Abington Road, Cleveland, OH 44106.

3 Present address: Medical College of Ohio at Toledo, Toledo, OH.

Received 9/12/85. Revised 12/23/85. Accepted 12/30/85.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Cancer Research.