Cancer Research Cancer Research Funding Available  Genetics and Biology of Brain Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 46, 1972-1979, April 1, 1986]
© 1986 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knox, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knox, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J. J.

Mechanism of Cytotoxicity of Anticancer Platinum Drugs: Evidence That cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum(II) and cis-Diammine-(1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato)platinum(II) Differ Only in the Kinetics of Their Interaction with DNA1

Richard J. Knox, Frank Friedlos, David A. Lydall and John J. Roberts

Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PX, United Kingdom

The kinetics of the aquation reactions of cisplatin and carboplatin and their subsequent reactions with DNA, both in vitro and in vivo, have been measured. The results have been extrapolated to indicate the expected cytotoxicity of these compounds in cells obtained from human cancer patients.

Rate constants for the aquation at 37°C of cisplatin and carboplatin of 8 x 10-5 and 7.2 x 10-7 s-1, respectively, were calculated from the half-life of these compounds in phosphate buffer, pH 7. This difference in their rate of activation was matched by their rates of binding to DNA. By use of a 14C-labeled ligand, carboplatin was shown to bind monofunctionally to DNA, after which there was a time-dependent formation of difunctional interstrand cross-links, formed from some of these initially monofunctional adducts. A similar, although faster, accumulation of cross-links was seen when cisplatin was bound to DNA. The loss of the 14C-CBDCA ligand of carboplatin was calculated to occur with a rate constant of 1.3 x 10-5 s-1 which was similar to that for the rate of formation of interstrand cross-links and faster than that for the monofunctional reaction with DNA. It was concluded therefore that the CBDCA ligand becomes a more labile leaving group once carboplatin has been monoaquated. In contrast, both chloro-ligands of cisplatin were shown to leave at similar rates. The fact that other difunctional lesions were formed to the same extent, by equal bound doses of cisplatin or carboplatin, was indicated by the unwinding of supercoiled plasmid DNA. The effects of cisplatin and carboplatin on this DNA were the same once bound to the same extent. About a 100-fold larger dose of carboplatin was, as predicted by their rates of aquation, required to produce equivalent binding to plasmid DNA.

In vivo, equal binding of the two drugs to DNA of various cell systems resulted in equal cytotoxicity. Again a much larger dose (20- to 40-fold) of carboplatin was required to produce this equal binding. In general a DNA bound platinum level of about 20 nmol/g reduced cell survival by 90%, although certain cell lines were shown to be much more sensitive to DNA bound platinum.

Similar binding values, to those above, were obtained in the DNA extracted from cells of human cancer patients treated with cisplatin. It was inferred that the cytotoxic effect of this level of platinum on DNA would be (unless the cells were of a sensitive phenotype) about 90%.

This work has shown that once bound to DNA in equal amounts both cisplatin and carboplatin cause equal difunctional lesions, interstrand cross-links, and cytotoxicity. The large differences in dose required to produce these effects were accounted for by the much faster rate of aquation of cisplatin.

1 We are grateful to Johnson Matthey Research Centre for financial support and for grants from the Medical Research Council and the Cancer Research Campaign.

Received 7/29/85. Revised 12/13/85. Accepted 12/26/85.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
T. Fujii, H. Kunikane, H. Okamoto, K. Watanabe, H. Kunitoh, K. Mori, A. Yokoyama, H. Fukuda, T. Tamura, and N. Saijo
A Phase II Study of Cisplatin and Irinotecan as Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Accelerated Hyperfractionated Thoracic Radiotherapy with Daily Low-dose Carboplatin in Unresectable Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: JCOG 9510
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2009; 39(12): 784 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
X.-M. Hou, X.-H. Zhang, K.-J. Wei, C. Ji, S.-X. Dou, W.-C. Wang, M. Li, and P.-Y. Wang
Cisplatin induces loop structures and condensation of single DNA molecules
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2009; 37(5): 1400 - 1410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. Ceppi, S. Novello, A. Cambieri, M. Longo, V. Monica, M. Lo Iacono, M. Giaj-Levra, S. Saviozzi, M. Volante, M. Papotti, et al.
Polymerase {eta} mRNA Expression Predicts Survival of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2009; 15(3): 1039 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. N. Bose, L. Maurmann, R. J. Mishur, L. Yasui, S. Gupta, W. S. Grayburn, H. Hofstetter, and T. Salley
Non-DNA-binding platinum anticancer agents: Cytotoxic activities of platinum-phosphato complexes towards human ovarian cancer cells
PNAS, November 25, 2008; 105(47): 18314 - 18319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Rousseau, C. Boudou, R. F. Barth, J. Balosso, F. Esteve, and H. Elleaume
Enhanced Survival and Cure of F98 Glioma Bearing Rats following Intracerebral Delivery of Carboplatin in Combination with Photon Irradiation
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 13(17): 5195 - 5201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
I. H.L. Hamelers, E. van Loenen, R. W.H.M. Staffhorst, B. de Kruijff, and A. I.P.M. de Kroon
Carboplatin nanocapsules: a highly cytotoxic, phospholipid-based formulation of carboplatin.
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2006; 5(8): 2007 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
B. Liedert, D. Pluim, J. Schellens, and J. Thomale
Adduct-specific monoclonal antibodies for the measurement of cisplatin-induced DNA lesions in individual cell nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(6): e47 - e47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. Atagi, M. Kawahara, T. Tamura, K. Noda, K. Watanabe, A. Yokoyama, T. Sugiura, H. Senba, S. Ishikura, H. Ikeda, et al.
Standard Thoracic Radiotherapy With or Without Concurrent Daily Low-dose Carboplatin in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Phase III Trial of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG9812)
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2005; 35(4): 195 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
H. J. M. Groen, A. H. W. van der Leest, E. Fokkema, P. R. Timmer, G. D. Nossent, W. J. G. M. Smit, J. Nabers, H. J. Hoekstra, J. Hermans, R. Otter, et al.
Continuously infused carboplatin used as radiosensitizer in locally unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase III study
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2004; 15(3): 427 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
P. D. Sadowitz, B. A. Hubbard, J. C. Dabrowiak, J. Goodisman, K. A. Tacka, M. K. Aktas, M. J. Cunningham, R. L. Dubowy, and A.-K. Souid
Kinetics of Cisplatin Binding to Cellular DNA and Modulations by Thiol-Blocking Agents and Thiol Drugs
Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2002; 30(2): 183 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
W.-C. Su, S.-L. Chang, T.-Y. Chen, J.-S. Chen, and C.-J. Tsao
Comparison of In Vitro Growth-inhibitory Activity of Carboplatin and Cisplatin on Leukemic Cells and Hematopoietic Progenitors: the Myelosuppressive Activity of Carboplatin May Be Greater Than Its Antileukemic Effect
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2000; 30(12): 562 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. Atagi, M. Kawahara, M. Ogawara, K. Matsui, N. Masuda, S. Kudoh, S. Negoro, and K. Furuse
Phase II Trial of Daily Low-dose Carboplatin and Thoracic Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2000; 30(2): 59 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. S. Go and A. A. Adjei
Review of the Comparative Pharmacology and Clinical Activity of Cisplatin and Carboplatin
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 1999; 17(1): 409 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Q. He, C. H. Liang, and S. J. Lippard
Steroid hormones induce HMG1 overexpression and sensitize breast cancer cells to cisplatin and carboplatin
PNAS, May 23, 2000; 97(11): 5768 - 5772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Cancer Research.