| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
LBI-Basic Research Program, Laboratory of Chemical and Physical Carcinogenesis [C. J. M., M. B. K-K.], and PRI-Operations and Technical Support, Pathology Histotechnology Laboratory [R. M. K.], NCI-Frederick Cancer Research Facility, Frederick, Maryland 21701
The carcinogenic effects of sequential treatment of female F344 rats with two nitrosamines were studied. The animals received either methylethylnitrosamine (NMEA), a strong liver carcinogen, N-nitrosopyrrolidine, (NPyr), a weaker liver carcinogen. The sequentially treated groups were given NMEA followed by NMA and vice versa, NPyr followed by NMEA and vice versa. The dose and duration for reach chemical in the sequentially treated groups were identical for the individual treatments. The animals were allowed to die or were killed when moribund. The animals surviving longer than 110 weeks were sacrificed. The NMEA-NPyr and NPyr-NMEA groups had a tumor spectrum characteristic for NMEA alone (a mixture of hepatic carcinomas and sarcomas with extensive metastases to the lungs). The survival was reduced in the NMEA-NPyr group compared to the NMEA alone group. The time to death of the NMA-NMEA group was not affected by the NMA treatment, but many of the animals had esophageal neoplasms. The NMEA-NMA group survival was reduced when compared to the NMEA alone group but the tumor spectrum was dominated by NMEA. The data indicate that when the target organ is the same, the effect of two nitrosamines is additive with the stronger carcinogen dominating the tumor spectrum. When the target organs are different, the initial exposure influences the tumor spectrum, although the treatment with the second nitrosamine enhances the tumorigenicity of the initial nitrosamine.
1 Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, under Contract N01-CO-23909 with Litton Bionetics, Inc. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government.
Received 10/10/85. Revised 9/ 1/86. Accepted 1/15/86.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |