Cancer Research AACR Legacy  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 46, 2740-2744, June 1, 1986]
© 1986 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bregman, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Fukushima, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bregman, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Fukushima, M.

Inhibition of Human Melanoma Growth by Prostaglandin A, D, and J Analogues1

Marvin D. Bregman2, Carole Funk and Masanori Fukushima

Cancer Center Division, University of Arizona, College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona 85724 [M. D. B., C. F.], and AlCHl Cancer Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Chikussa-ku, Nagoya, Japan 464 [M. F.]

The relative inhibitory potency of prostaglandin A (PGA) and prostaglandin J2 (PGJ2) analogues compared to prostaglandin A1 (PGA1) was determined in a clonogenic assay system. Three human melanoma cell strains (C8146A, C8146C, and C8161), a human melanoma cell line (M1RW5) and a human neuroblastoma cell line (IMR-32) were used. Prostaglandin analogues were screened in the clonogenic assay system and the dose effect curves were analyzed by linear regression utilizing the median effect relationship. The computer-generated 50% and 95% inhibitory doses showed that 15-deoxyl-16-hydroxyl-16-vinyl-prostaglandin A2 (DHV-PGA2) was from two- to three-fold more active than PGA1 in inhibiting the clonogenic growth of human melanoma cells. Based on the 50% inhibitory dose, PGJ2 and its analogues were from two to five times more potent than PGA1. The {sigma}12- and {sigma}12,14-PGJ2 were the most potent of the prostaglandins tested. However, the 95% inhibitory dose for prostaglandin D2 (PGD2), PGJ2 and its analogues against neuroblastoma did not show any enhancement in activity in comparison to PGA1, suggesting that some tumor specificity in the activity of these analogues may be signified by the neuroblastoma data.

Prostaglandins which contained a fluoride substitution at position 11 were also tested for activity. As we previously observed with other analogues which did not contain an {alpha},ß-unsaturated carbonyl group in the cyclopentane ring, 9ß,15{alpha}-dihydroxy-11ß-fluoroprosta-5-cis-13-trans-dienoic acid and 9{alpha},15{alpha}-dihydroxy-11ß-fluoroprosta-5-cis-13-trans-dienoic acid did not inhibit the clonogenic growth of human melanoma cells.

Administration s.c. to established human melanoma tumors growing in athymic nude mice caused a significant growth inhibition. The treatment schedules ranged from 1 to 8 days. Injection s.c. of PGA1 at a dose of 40 mg/kg/day resulted in a 20% suppression in tumor growth. Higher doses (100 and 200 mg/kg/day) effected an 80% reduction in tumor growth. The higher doses were associated with reversible toxicities, diarrhea and skin inflammation. Administration of DHV-PGA2 at a dose of 20 mg/kg/day resulted in 40% reduction in tumor growth. The increased in vivo potency of DHV-PGA2 corresponds to the results obtained in the clonogenic assay system.

1 This investigation was supported by USPHS Grant CA34689 awarded by the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 11/ 7/85. Revised 2/12/86. Accepted 2/14/86.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. J. Kim, K.S. Prabhu, F. J. Gonzalez, and J. M. Peters
Inhibition of chemically induced skin carcinogenesis by sulindac is independent of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{beta}/{delta} (PPAR{beta}/{delta})
Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2006; 27(5): 1105 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
W. Wang and N. Ballatori
Endogenous Glutathione Conjugates: Occurrence and Biological Functions
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 1998; 50(3): 335 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Tanikawa, K. Yamada, K. Tominaga, H. Morisaki, Y. Kaneko, K. Ikeda, M. Suzuki, T. Kiho, K. Tomokiyo, K. Furuta, et al.
Potent Prostaglandin A1 Analogs That Suppress Tumor Cell Growth through Induction of p21 and Reduction of Cyclin E
J. Biol. Chem., July 17, 1998; 273(29): 18522 - 18527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Cancer Research.