| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Biology, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064
The relationship between cell morphology, proliferation, and contact inhibition was studied in normal and malignant human cells which varied in their sensitivity to contact inhibition. Their ability to proliferate was examined under conditions where the cells were constrained into different shapes by plating onto plastic surfaces coated with poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) can precisely vary the shape of cells without toxicity. Cell proliferation was quantitated by cell counts and labeling indices were determined by autoradiography. The normal JHU-1 foreskin fibroblasts and IMR-90 lung fibroblasts exhibitied contact-inhibited growth with a saturation density of 2.9 x 105 and 2.0 x 105 cells/cm2, respectively. These cells also exhibited stringent dependency on cell shape with a mitotic index of less than 3% at poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) concentrations at which the cells were rounded versus a labeling index of 7590% when the cells were flat. The malignant bladder carcinoma line RT-4 exhibited partial contact-inhibited growth. Its dependency on cell shape was less stringent than that of normal cells with a mitotic index of 3740% when rounded and 79% when flat. The malignant fibrosarcoma line, HT1080, was not contact inhibited and was entirely shape independent with a mitotic index of 7090% regardless of cell shape. Treatment of HT1080 cells with low concentration of human fibroblast interferon (less than 40 units/ml) restored shape-dependent proliferation while having little effect on normal cells. Subantiproliferative doses of interferon were also shown to restore contact-inhibited proliferation control to malignant cells previously lacking it. The concordant restoration of contact inhibition and shape-dependent proliferation in malignant cells by interferon suggest that these two types of proliferation controls represent a manifestation of common regulatory mechanisms. However, since these effects occurred at interferon concentrations below that required to produce an antiproliferative effect, these actions of interferon may be distinct from the antiproliferative action.
1 Supported in part by a grant from The Vicks Research Center, Richardson-Vicks, Inc., and by an institutional grant from The Catholic University of America.
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.
Received 7/24/85. Revised 2/ 4/86. Accepted 3/ 5/86.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Morrison and E. Seidel Cell spreading and the regulation of ornithine decarboxylase J. Cell Sci., January 12, 1995; 108(12): 3787 - 3794. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |