Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 46, 3273-3278, July 1, 1986]
© 1986 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by McCune, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by McCune, C. S.

In Vivo Enhancement of Antitumor Immunity by Interleukin 2-rich Lymphokines1

Robert W. O'Donnell, Diana M. Marquis, Govind S. Mudholkar and Craig S. McCune

Cancer Center [R. W. O'D., D. M. M., C. S. M.]; Division of Biostatistics [G. S. M.]; and Department of Medicine [C. S. M.], University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642

The ability of interleukin 2 (IL-2) to enhance in vivo antitumor immunity has been evaluated in the line 1 alveolar cell carcinoma (L1) model of BALB/c mice. A crude supernatant from phorbol myristate acetate exposed EL-4 cells rich in IL-2 plus other lymphokines (EL-4 IL-2), a concanavalin A-induced supernatant from murine splenocytes (Con A IL-2), and recombinant IL-2 (rIL-2) provided by Biogen were tested. Mice were immunized with a cloned population of L1 cells (106 irradiated L1 cells given s.c. in the left inguinal region) followed by s.c. injections of EL-4 IL-2, Con A IL-2, or rIL-2 given to the same site. Two immunizations of L1 cells each followed by IL-2 administration were given prior to challenge with live L1 cells s.c. on the right chest wall. Mice receiving EL-4 IL-2 survived significantly longer than those receiving L1 cells only. Daily administration of EL-4 IL-2 for 7 days after the last L1 immunization was significantly better than 3 days (P < 0.01) which in turn was significantly better than 1 day (P < 0.05). Among the doses tested (normalized in vitro to the Biologic Response Modifiers Program IL-2 standard) 404 units of IL-2/injection was optimal. The EL-4 IL-2 had to be injected adjacent to the site of L1 cells; s.c. injection at a distant site or i.p. was not effective. When rIL-2 or Con A IL-2 was substituted for EL-4 IL-2, survival was not prolonged; however, if Con A IL-2 (low IL-2 levels) was supplemented with rIL-2 to 404 units of IL-2, it augmented immunity as well as 404 units of EL-4 IL-2. The data suggest that IL-2 is not the only lymphokine active in augmenting antitumor immunity induced by L1 cells. Some preliminary experiments indicate that a multilymphokine approach may have potential clinical relevance.

1 Supported by USPHS Grant CA27625, Cancer Center Core Support Grant CA11198, and a generous gift from the Hanna Family.

Received 8/26/85. Revised 2/ 3/86. Accepted 4/ 8/86.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Cancer Research.