Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 46, 3876-3885, August 1, 1986]
© 1986 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Day, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Day, R. S.

Treatment Sequencing, Asymmetry, and Uncertainty: Protocol Strategies for Combination Chemotherapy1

Roger S. Day

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

This paper summarizes a large number of simulations which relax the "symmetry" assumptions in the Goldie-Coldman treatment model, which was symmetrical with respect to two drugs considered for use together. The results are that, under relevant violations of the assumptions, non-alternating treatment schedules frequently outperform alternation and combination substantially. The magnitudes of these effects are at least as large as the improvements made by shortening the time periods between treatment changes. Three protocol design strategies derived from these results are described: (a) when there is no knowledge of parameters, empirical trials in search of the best schedule can be contemplated, if patients in such trials have fundamentally "similar" tumors, in a special sense given the name "pattern homogeneity"; (b) when minimal knowledge of cell kill parameters is available, the "worst drug rule" could perform remarkably well. This strategy is contrary to much of current practice, but a clear rationale is proposed; and (c) when detailed knowledge of tumor parameters is available for each individual, detailed modeling to predict optimal schedule promises great improvements in treatment outcome.

Additional considerations addressed include factors determining the merit of these strategies, suggestions for new laboratory research, and implications for future clinical chemotherapy research.

1 Supported by USPHS Research Fellowship T32-ES07142-03, by National Cancer Institute Research Grant CA-39640, and by a Biomedical Research Support Grant administered through Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

Received 9/23/85. Revised 3/12/86. Accepted 5/ 1/86.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. Sculier, J. Lafitte, J Lecomte, C. Alexopoulos, O Van Cutsem, V Giner, A Efremidis, M. Berchier, T Collon, A. Meert, et al.
A phase III randomised trial comparing sequential chemotherapy using cisplatin-based regimen and paclitaxel to cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2007; 18(6): 1037 - 1042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
F. Grossi, M. Aita, A. Follador, C. Defferrari, A. Brianti, G. Sinaccio, and O. Belvedere
Sequential, Alternating, and Maintenance/Consolidation Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review of the Literature
Oncologist, April 1, 2007; 12(4): 451 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. J. Poole, H. M. Earl, L. Hiller, J. A. Dunn, S. Bathers, R. J. Grieve, D. A. Spooner, R. K. Agrawal, I. N. Fernando, A. M. Brunt, et al.
Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil as Adjuvant Therapy for Early Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., November 2, 2006; 355(18): 1851 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. J. Edelman, J. I. Clark, K. Chansky, K. Albain, N. Bhoopalam, G. R. Weiss, J. K. Giguere, K. Kelly, J. Crowley, and D. R. Gandara
Randomized Phase II Trial of Sequential Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (SWOG 9806): Carboplatin/Gemcitabine followed by Paclitaxel or Cisplatin/Vinorelbine followed by Docetaxel
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2004; 10(15): 5022 - 5026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
S. N. Gardner and M. Fernandes
New tools for cancer chemotherapy: computational assistance for tailoring treatments
Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2003; 2(10): 1079 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A. O'Brate, M. Tarón, D. Gandara, and R. Rosell
Sharing New Approaches to Translational Research in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Oncologist, December 1, 2000; 5(6): 514 - 519.
[Full Text]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. J. Edelman
Commentary on "Gemcitabine: Single-Agent and Combination Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer" : The Oncologist 1999;4:241-251
Oncologist, June 1, 1999; 4(3): 252 - 255.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Cancer Research.