Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 46, 4237s-4240s, August 1, 1986]
© 1986 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, V. C.
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, V. C.
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, E. J.

Determination of Estrogen Receptor in Breast Cancer Using Monoclonal Antibody Technology: Results of a Multicenter Study in the United States1

V. Craig Jordan2, Herbert I. Jacobson and Edward J. Keenan

Department of Human Oncology, Wisconsin Clinical Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53792 [V. C. J.]; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New York, Albany, New York [H. I. J.]; and Department of Surgery, The Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201 [E.J.K.]

Three laboratories compared their routine steroid binding assays with the Abbott estrogen receptor-enzyme immunoassay (ER-EIA) to determine ER in breast cancer cytosols. Each laboratory was first trained to use the ER-EIA kit and then performed routine proficiency panels to determine assay reproducibility. The frozen panels prepared from MCF-7 cytosol produced good intraassay results but the between assay coefficients of variation were frequently above 10%. Lyophilized MCF-7 cytosols produced better reproducibility upon repeated assay. One laboratory demonstrated that New England Nuclear steroid binding kits and the ER-EIA produced comparable results when MCF-7 lyophilized cytosols were used. The analysis of breast tumor samples demonstrated excellent linear correlation coefficients for each laboratory (>0.92 N approx. 60 samples each) but different slopes. The comparison of the ER-EIA with the New England Nuclear steroid binding assay produced a slope of 1.13. The ER-EIA appears to produce comparable results to the conventional steroid binding assays for the determination of ER in breast tumor cytosols.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Cancer Research.