Cancer Research  Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 46, 4379-4383, September 1, 1986]
© 1986 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teicher, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Frei, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teicher, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Frei, E., III

Alkylating Agents: In Vitro Studies of Cross-Resistance Patterns in Human Cell Lines1

Beverly A. Teicher2, Carol A. Cucchi, Jonathan B. Lee, Jennifer L. Flatow, Andre Rosowsky and Emil Frei, III

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

The alkylating agents represent one of the most important classes of antitumor agents and play a major role in combination with other agents in the curative chemotherapy of selected human cancers. By repeatedly exposing cells to escalating doses of an alkylating agent, we have developed four human tumor cell lines which are relatively stably resistant to the drug with which the culture was treated. The response of these cell lines to a variety of alkylating agents was compared to the response of the parent cell lines to the same drug. The Raji/HN2 line was 7-fold resistant to nitrogen mustard and about 3-fold resistant to 4-hydroxyperoxycyclophosphamide, but it was not resistant to N,N'-bis(2-chloroethyl)-N-nitrosourea (BCNU), melphalan (MEL), busulfan, trimethyleneiminethiophosphoramide, 4-hydroperoxyifosfamide, or cisplatin [cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)] (CDDP). The Raji/BCNU line was 5.3-fold resistant to BCNU and 4-fold resistant to both MEL and CDDP. The Raji/CP line was 7-fold resistant to CDDP and 3-fold resistant to both nitrogen mustard and BCNU, but it was not resistant to busulfan, trimethyleneiminethiophosphoramide, or 4-hydroperoxyifosfamide. The SCC-25/CP line, which was 12-fold resistant to CDDP, was 5-fold resistant to MEL and 3-fold resistant to 4-hydroxyperoxycyclophosphamide. The SCC-25/CP line was almost 24-fold resistant to methotrexate after 30-min treatment and about 7-fold resistant to methotrexate after continuous treatment. None of the other cell lines was resistant to methotrexate. The survival of SCC-25 and SCC-25/CP cells exposed to several antineoplastic agents was examined over several logs of survival. The SCC-25/CP cells are highly resistant to CDDP; the ratio of the slopes of the survival curves (SCC-25/CP to SCC-25) of the two lines was 43. At survivals of 1%, resistance to MEL and BCNU became evident in the SCC-25/CP line. At survivals of 0.1%, resistance to mitomycin C and, to a lesser degree, to Adriamycin and vincristine was evident. It is more difficult to produce resistance to alkylating agents, even with extended selection pressure, than to other antineoplastic drugs such as antimetabolites and natural products. We found no evidence of pleiotropic resistance in any alkylating agent-resistant cell line. Our results suggest that a judicious choice of alkylating agents given in sequential or concurrent combination may be a rational treatment strategy with potential applications in the clinic.

1 This work is supported by National Cancer Institute Grant 1P01-CA38493.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 3/14/86. Revised 6/ 9/86. Accepted 6/10/86.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Gururangan, W. P. Petros, T. Y. Poussaint, M. L. Hancock, P. C. Phillips, H. S. Friedman, L. Bomgaars, S. M. Blaney, L. E. Kun, and J. M. Boyett
Phase I Trial of Intrathecal Spartaject Busulfan in Children with Neoplastic Meningitis: a Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium Study (PBTC-004)
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 12(5): 1540 - 1546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. P. Canellos
Clinical Research Saves Money: Reflections on High-Dose Therapy of Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 1999; 17(7): 1965 - 1965.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
B. Brockstein and S. Williams
High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue for breast cancer: yesterday, today and tomorrow
Stem Cells, January 1, 1996; 14(1): 79 - 89.
[Abstract]


Home page
ScienceHome page
B. Teicher, T. Herman, S. Holden, Y. Wang, M. Pfeffer, J. Crawford, and E Frei 3rd
Tumor resistance to alkylating agents conferred by mechanisms operative only in vivo
Science, March 23, 1990; 247(4949): 1457 - 1461.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
S. Kelley, A Basu, B. Teicher, M. Hacker, D. Hamer, and J. Lazo
Overexpression of metallothionein confers resistance to anticancer drugs
Science, September 30, 1988; 241(4874): 1813 - 1815.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Cancer Research.