| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Cell Biology [A. A. C., L. V. D., M. T. R., T. J., C. R. V.] and Protein Chemistry [L. S. L.], Cetus Corporation, Emeryville, California 94608
We investigated optimal conditions for cytotoxicity to tumor cell lines by recombinant human tumor necrosis factor (rhTNF) and the effect of amino-terminal deletions on the bioactivity of the rhTNF molecule. Two of four deletion muteins (-4 and -7) of rhTNF exhibit 2- to 3-fold enhancement of cytotoxicity/cytostasis against a variety of human carcinomas, a fibrosarcoma, and a melanoma cell line with no toxicity on normal fibroblastic and epithelial cultures. Of the two other muteins the -8 displayed equivalent and/or increased cytotoxicity/cytostasis while the -10 was consistently less cytotoxic than the parent on the same cell lines. Continuous exposure to TNF for
96 h led to maximal cytotoxicity to tumor lines (99.99% with L929 cells) with no evidence of recovery.
Pretreatment with actinomycin D (0.00310 µg/ml for 1 h) rendered 82% of rhTNF-resistant cell lines (both tumor and normal) susceptible to its cytotoxic action within 24 h. However, the highest nontoxic concentrations of Actinomycin D necessary for rendering normal cell lines susceptible to TNF action were about 103000-fold higher than those necessary for converting resistant tumor cell lines.
Similarly, preinfection of L929 cells with vesicular stomatitis virus (multiplicity of infection, 10-210-4 for 1 h) rendered the cells 210-fold more susceptible to the cytotoxic action of rhTNF in 18 h. Our data suggest that rhTNF and its muteins represent potentially useful anticancer agents; however, adequate dosing and prolonged exposure may be critical in demonstrating cytotoxicity/cytostasis. The data also show that although normal and tumor cell lines became susceptible to cytotoxicity by rhTNF and actinomycin D, combination therapy of the two agents may be possible at defined concentrations.
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Cetus Corporation, 1400 Fifty-Third Street, Emeryville, CA 94608.
Received 6/16/86. Revised 9/ 8/86. Accepted 9/11/86.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-S. Cha, J.-S. Kim, H.-S. Cho, N.-K. Shin, W. Jeong, H.-C. Shin, Y. J. Kim, J. H. Hahn, and B.-H. Oh High Resolution Crystal Structure of a Human Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Mutant with Low Systemic Toxicity J. Biol. Chem., January 23, 1998; 273(4): 2153 - 2160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Taniyama, T. Morita, Y. Yamagishi, A. Kato, C. Bando, N. Okawa, and A. Kaji Human lymphotoxin mutein lacks hypotensive activity but has higher in vivo antitumor activity than lymphotoxin or tumor necrosis factor PNAS, April 1, 1997; 94(7): 3324 - 3329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Decoster, B. Vanhaesebroeck, P. Vandenabeele, J. Grooten, and W. Fiers Generation and Biological Characterization of Membrane-bound, Uncleavable Murine Tumor Necrosis Factor J. Biol. Chem., August 4, 1995; 270(31): 18473 - 18478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |