Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 47, 2571-2575, May 15, 1987]
© 1987 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rhee, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Levitt, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rhee, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Levitt, S. H.

Difference in the Thermotolerance of Mouse Mammary Carcinoma Cells in Vivo and in Vitro1

Juong G. Rhee2, Vicki L. Schuman, Chang W. Song and Seymour H. Levitt

Department of Therapeutic Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

The kinetics of thermotolerance development were compared for cells in the SCK mammary carcinoma of A/J mice, and the same cells cultured in vitro. Tumors in the legs of mice or cells in culture flasks were conditioned with heat in a water bath at 43°C for 30 min and the cells were left in the tumors or the culture flasks for various lengths of time after heat conditioning. The magnitude of thermotolerance was determined by preparing single cells and subjecting them to a test heating in a controlled environment in vitro at 43°C, and the survival of the cells was determined by measuring the colony-forming ability in vitro. Thermotolerance in tumors reached its maximum 12 h after heat conditioning, at which time the survival response was characterized by Do (the duration of heating required for exponential cell inactivation to 1/e) of 116 min. This changed to a Do of 170 min when the cells in tumors were incubated in culture medium of neutral pH during the development of thermotolerance. In contrast, the thermotolerance of cells cultured in vitro was fully developed within 8 h, at which time the Do was 306 min. The kinetics of thermotolerance development, therefore, varied significantly between the cells of the same origin but grown in vivo or in vitro. Killing of tumor cells in vivo caused by the heat-conditioning dose was about three times greater than that for tumor cells in vitro, but the greater damage did not result in a greater development of thermotolerance. The above results indicate that the development of thermotolerance in tumors is suppressed by the influence of intratumor environment.

1 This work was supported by National Cancer Institute Grants CA44056 and CA13353.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 10/15/86. Revised 2/ 6/87. Accepted 2/11/87.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1987 by the American Association for Cancer Research.