Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 47, 3123-3129, June 15, 1987]
© 1987 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sohn, O. S.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sohn, O. S.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. M.

Enhancement of Rat Liver Microsomal Metabolism of Azoxymethane to Methylazoxymethanol by Chronic Ethanol Administration: Similarity to the Microsomal Metabolism of N-Nitrosodimethylamine1

Ock Soon Sohn, Emerich S. Fiala2, Christine Puz, Stanley R. Hamilton and Gary M. Williams

Naylor Dana Institute for Disease Prevention, Valhalla, New York 10595 [O. S. S., E. S. F., C. P., G. M. W.]; and Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 [S. R. H.]

We compared the metabolism of azoxymethane (AOM) and of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) by liver microsomes obtained from male F344 rats pair-fed for 3 weeks either a control liquid diet or an isocaloric liquid diet containing ethanol at a concentration of 6.6% by volume. High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of the products of the microsomal metabolism of AOM showed that methylazoxymethanol was the only primary metabolite. While the formation of small (less than 4% of methylazoxymethanol) quantities of methanol and formaldehyde could also be detected in this reaction, these products could be accounted for almost entirely by the spontaneous decomposition of methylazoxymethanol. With NDMA as the substrate in the incubation system, the formation of methylamine, formaldehyde, methanol, and an additional, as yet unidentified metabolite was detected. Liver microsomes obtained from rats fed the ethanol-containing diet up to the time of sacrifice were 12–18 times more active in the metabolism of both AOM and NDMA than liver microsomes obtained from rats fed the control, ethanol-free diet for the same period. When rats fed the ethanol diet for 20.5 days were fed the control diet for 0.5 days and then sacrificed, only a 2- to 3-fold increase in the metabolism of both AOM and NDMA by liver microsomes was observed, indicating that cessation of ethanol intake results in a rapid decrease of the ethanol-induced metabolic enzymes. Hepatocytes isolated from ethanol-fed rats showed a significantly enhanced sensitivity to AOM- as well as to NDMA-induced unscheduled DNA synthesis, indicating that the increased rate of microsomal metabolism induced by ethanol is associated with enhanced carcinogen activation in vitro. The metabolism of AOM and NDMA by liver microsomes was inhibited to similar extents by carbon monoxide, pyrazole, sodium azide, aminoacetonitrile, imidazole, and ethanol. In addition, both ethanol and NDMA were found to inhibit competitively the microsomal metabolism of AOM. These results suggest that AOM and NDMA are metabolized by very similar, indeed perhaps the same rat liver microsomal enzyme(s).

1 This investigation was supported by National Cancer Institute Grants CA31012 (E. S. F.) and CA29714 (S. R. H.).

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division of Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, Naylor Dana Institute, Dana Road, Valhalla, NY 10595.

Received 1/13/87. Revised 3/16/87. Accepted 3/20/87.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
T. E. Riehl, R. J. George, M. A. Sturmoski, R. May, B. Dieckgraefe, S. Anant, and C. W. Houchen
Azoxymethane protects intestinal stem cells and reduces crypt epithelial mitosis through a COX-1-dependent mechanism
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): G1062 - G1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
O. S. Sohn, E. S. Fiala, S. P. Requeijo, J. H. Weisburger, and F. J. Gonzalez
Differential Effects of CYP2E1 Status on the Metabolic Activation of the Colon Carcinogens Azoxymethane and Methylazoxymethanol
Cancer Res., December 1, 2001; 61(23): 8435 - 8440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
F.-L. Chung, C.C. Conaway, C.V. Rao, and B. S. Reddy
Chemoprevention of colonic aberrant crypt foci in Fischer rats by sulforaphane and phenethyl isothiocyanate
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2000; 21(12): 2287 - 2291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1987 by the American Association for Cancer Research.