| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Division of Chemical Carcinogenesis, Naylor Dana Institute for Disease Prevention, American Health Foundation, Valhalla, New York 10595 [S. A., K. H., G. B., S. S. H.] and Ben May Institute for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 [J. P., R. G. H.]
The stereoselectivity of mouse skin metabolic activation to dihydrodiols of the strong carcinogen 5-methylchrysene (5-MeC) and the weak carcinogen 6-methylchrysene (6-MeC) was investigated. Synthetic 1,2-dihydro-1,2-dihydroxy-5-methylchrysene (5-MeC-1,2-diol), 5-MeC-7,8-diol, and 6-MeC-1,2-diol were resolved into their R,R- and S,S-enantiomers by chiral stationary phase high performance liquid chromatography. The absolute configurations of the enantiomers were assigned by their circular dichroism spectra. Using these enantiomers as standards, the metabolism of 5-MeC and 6-MeC in vitro in rat and mouse liver and in vivo in mouse epidermis was investigated. Only the R,R-enantiomers of each dihydrodiol predominated (>90%). The dihydrodiol enantiomers were tested for tumor initiating activity on mouse skin. In each case, the R,R-dihydrodiol enantiomer was significantly more tumorigenic than the S,S-enantiomer. The most tumorigenic compound was 5-MeC-1R,2R-diol; it was significantly more active than either 5-MeC-7R,8R-diol or 6-MeC-1R,2R-diol. The results of this study demonstrate that there is a high degree of stereoselectivity in the metabolic activation of 5-MeC and 6-MeC to proximate tumorigenic dihydrodiols in mouse skin. The bay region methyl group has no effect on the stereoselectivity of activation to 1,2-dihydrodiol metabolites in the chrysene system.
1 This study was supported by Grants CA-44377 from the National Cancer Institute and BC-132 from the American Cancer Society. This is paper 103 of the series "A Study of Chemical Carcinogenesis."
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division of Chemical Carcinogenesis, Naylor Dana Institute for Disease Prevention, American Health Foundation, Dana Road, Valhalla, NY 10595.
Received 12/15/86. Revised 4/ 1/87. Accepted 4/ 2/87.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. W. Shappell, U. Carlino-MacDonald, S. Amin, S. Kumar, and H. C. Sikka Comparative Metabolism of Chrysene and 5-Methylchrysene by Rat and Rainbow Trout Liver Microsomes Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2003; 72(2): 260 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |