Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 47, 4109-4115, August 1, 1987]
© 1987 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marushige, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Koestner, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marushige, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Koestner, A.

Modulation of Growth and of Morphological Characteristics in Glioma Cells by Nerve Growth Factor and Glia Maturation Factor1

Yasuko Marushige2, Narayan R. Raju3, Keiji Marushige and Adalbert Koestner

Department of Pathology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Anaplastic glioma T9 cells were treated with either nerve growth factor (NGF) or glia maturation factor (GMF) or both. It was found that, when T9 cells were treated with these factors in a chemically defined medium, both NGF and GMF induced characteristic changes of cell morphology and growth pattern. Several differences in the effects of NGF and GMF were noted. NGF retarded growth rate, whereas GMF did not. The cells treated with NGF were characterized by a flattened extended cytoplasm with numerous protruding processes. The cell masses were somatically connected by cell bridges. GMF, on the other hand, produced slender cells with long, branching processes forming an interconnecting cell net. Concomitant administration of NGF and GMF retarded cell growth as was demonstrated with NGF alone and induced morphological changes predominantly attributable to GMF. The maximal effect of either NGF or GMF or both was attained after 4 days of treatment. A withdrawal of the factors from the medium following various periods of treatment revealed that the effects of GMF were readily reversible while morphological changes induced by NGF persisted in its absence.

1 This work was supported by National Cancer Institute Grant CA32594.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Pathology, A622 East Fee Hall, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

3 Recipient of the Upjohn Company Fellowship.

Received 2/ 2/87. Revised 5/ 5/87. Accepted 5/ 8/87.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Dobrowsky, M. Werner, A. Castellino, M. Chao, and Y. Hannun
Activation of the sphingomyelin cycle through the low-affinity neurotrophin receptor
Science, September 9, 1994; 265(5178): 1596 - 1599.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1987 by the American Association for Cancer Research.