Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 47, 2142-2147, April 15, 1987]
© 1987 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Costa, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Costa, M.

Comparison of the Localization of Chromosome Damage Induced by Calcium Chromate and Nickel Compounds1

Pramila Sen, Kathleen Conway and Max Costa2

Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas 77025 [P. S.], and Institute of Environmental Medicine, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York 10016 [K. C., M. C.]

Chromosomal aberrations were studied in Chinese hamster ovary cells and in C3H10T1/2 cells following treatment with NiCl2, crystalline NiS, and CaCrO4. All three compounds caused an increase in chromosomal aberrations in a concentration- and time-dependent fashion. The chromosomal aberrations induced by NiCl2, and crystalline NiS occurred predominantly in heterochromatic regions of the chromosomes. Additionally, treatment of cells with crystalline NiS and to a smaller extent long-term treatment with NiCl2 caused a preferential effect on the condensation state of the heterochromatic long arm of the X-chromosome in hamster cells. In contrast, treatment of cells with CaCrO4 did not induce aberrations preferentially in heterochromatin. These results are interesting because nickel(II), which is thought to be the ultimate carcinogen of nickel compounds, binds poorly to DNA, is weakly mutagenic, but induces chromosome damage, probably because of its interaction with nuclear proteins in heterochromatin. Chromate binds to DNA, is mutagenic, and interacts with chromatin randomly.

1 Primary support for this work was provided by Grant R812127 from the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Additional support was also provided by Grant CA43070 from the National Cancer Institute, by Center Grant ES00260 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Center Grant CA13343 from the National Cancer Institute, and Grant 00009 from the American Cancer Society.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Institute of Environmental Medicine, New York University Medical Center, 550 First Ave., New York, NY 10016.

Received 6/10/86. Revised 9/19/86. Revised 12/11/86. Accepted 1/12/87.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S.-M. Chuang, G.-Y. Liou, and J.-L. Yang
Activation of JNK, p38 and ERK mitogen-activated protein kinases by chromium(VI) is mediated through oxidative stress but does not affect cytotoxicity
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2000; 21(8): 1491 - 1500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1987 by the American Association for Cancer Research.