Cancer Research Landon Prizes for Basic and Translational Cancer Research  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 48, 94-100, January 1, 1988]
© 1988 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teicher, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Frei, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teicher, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Frei, E., III

Combination of N,N',N''-Triethylenethiophosphoramide and Cyclophosphamide in Vitro and in Vivo1

Beverly A. Teicher2, Sylvia A. Holden, Carol A. Cucchi, Kathleen N. S. Cathcart, Timothy T. Korbut, Jennifer L. Flatow and Emil Frei, III

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Massachusetts 02115

In vitro and in vivo studies with the drug combination thioTEPA and cyclophosphamide (CPA) were carried out using the MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cell line and the EMT6 mouse mammary carcinoma cell line. In vitro, survival curves were essentially linear. The EMT6 cell line was less sensitive to thioTEPA than the MCF-7 cell line, with concentrations which reduce cell survival to 10% of 440 and 140 µM, respectively. The response of both cell lines to 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide was similar. Simultaneous and immediate sequential treatments with these drugs produced supraadditive cell killing of both cell lines, although the magnitude of the supraadditivity was greater in the MCF-7 cell line than in the EMT6 cell line. Both of these drugs appeared to be as effective as thiol-depleting agents as is diethyl maleate. By DNA alkaline elution, there was a pattern of increasing DNA cross-linking similar to the increasing levels of cytotoxicity of this drug combination with increasing thioTEPA concentrations. In the EMT6 tumor in vivo, the maximally tolerated combination therapy (5 mg/kg x 6 thioTEPA and 100 mg/kg x 3 CPA) produced about 25 days of tumor growth delay which was not significantly different than expected for additivity of the individual drugs. The survival of EMT6 tumor cells after treatment of the animals with various single doses of thioTEPA and CPA was assayed. Tumor cell killing by thioTEPA produced a very steep, linear survival curve through 5 logs. The tumor cell survival curve for CPA out to 500 mg/kg gave linear tumor cell kill through almost 4 logs. In all cases, the combination treatment tumor cell survivals fell well within the envelope of additivity. Both of these drugs are somewhat less toxic toward bone marrow cells by the granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit in vitro assay method than to tumor cells. The combination treatments were subadditive or additive in bone marrow granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit killing. When bone marrow is the dose-limiting tissue, there is a therapeutic advantage to the use of this drug combination.

1 Supported by National Cancer Institute Grant 1P01-CA38493 and grants from the Mathers Foundation and Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River, NY.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 7/ 2/87. Revised 10/ 1/87. Accepted 10/ 5/87.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
A. DeMichele, R. Aplenc, J. Botbyl, T. Colligan, L. Wray, M. Klein-Cabral, A. Foulkes, P. Gimotty, J. Glick, B. Weber, et al.
Drug-Metabolizing Enzyme Polymorphisms Predict Clinical Outcome in a Node-Positive Breast Cancer Cohort
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5552 - 5559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. C. F. Leonard, M. Lind, C. Twelves, R. Coleman, S. van Belle, C. Wilson, J. Ledermann, I. Kennedy, P. Barrett-Lee, T. Perren, et al.
Conventional Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Single-Cycle, Autograft-Supported, High-Dose, Late-Intensification Chemotherapy in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, July 21, 2004; 96(14): 1076 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
T. Chen, A. Aidoo, R. A. Mittelstaedt, D. A. Casciano, and R. H. Heflich
Hprt mutant frequency and molecular analysis of Hprt mutations in Fischer 344 rats treated with thiotepa
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 1999; 20(2): 269 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
S. Subramanyan and M. J. Kennedy
Breast Cancer: High-Dose Therapy
Oncologist, October 1, 1998; 3(5): 289 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1988 by the American Association for Cancer Research.