Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 48, 4107-4112, July 15, 1988]
© 1988 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tondini, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kufe, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tondini, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kufe, D. W.

Comparison of CA15-3 and Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Monitoring the Clinical Course of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer1

Carlo Tondini, Daniel F. Hayes, Rebecca Gelman, I. Craig Henderson and Donald W. Kufe2

Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology [C. T., D. F. H., D. W. K.], Breast Evaluation Center [D. F. H., I. C. H.], and Department of Biostatistics [R. G.], Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard School of Public Health [R. G.], Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Fifty-three women with metastatic breast cancer and serial plasma samples were selected to study the correlation between disease course and variations in circulating CA15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. Forty-nine patients had their first sample drawn at the beginning of therapy, while four patients did not receive any treatment during the period of study. Clinical course was scored as progressive disease (PD), responsive disease (RD), and stable disease on the basis of radiological and physical evaluations. The percentage of variation in antigen level between the initial sample and samples drawn at the time of the clinical evaluation was correlated with clinical course. CA15-3 levels above 22.0 units/ml and CEA levels above 3.0 ng/ml were considered elevated values. Antigen levels that increased ≥25% and decreased ≥25% from the initial value were considered to correlate with PD and RD, respectively. Variations in antigen levels ±25% from the initial value were considered to correlate with stable disease. Significantly more patients had elevated circulating levels of CA15-3 than CEA (96.2 versus 69.8%; P < 0.01) at some point in the course of disease. Overall, CA15-3 correlated with disease progression, regression, or stability in a higher number of patients than CEA (60.3 versus 39.6%; P = 0.02). CA15-3 increased ≥25% more often than CEA in patients with PD (75.0 versus 58.3%) and decreased ≥25% more often than CEA in patients with RD (38.1 versus 23.8%). In a logistic regression model, changes in CA15-3 levels correlated significantly with both PD (P = 0.0004) and RD (P = 0.02), while changes in CEA levels did not (PD, P = 0.34; RD, P = 0.92). Furthermore, correlations obtained when using both antigens together failed to improve the results obtained with CA15-3 alone. The present study thus demonstrates that CA15-3 is more useful than CEA in monitoring the clinical course of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

1 Supported in part by a grant from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro and European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer, by USPHS Grants CA 38869 and CA 01041 awarded by the National Cancer Institute, and by a Burroughs Wellcome Award in Clinical Pharmacology (D. W. K.).

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St., Boston, MA 02115.

Received 1/19/88. Revised 4/12/88. Accepted 4/18/88.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Harris, H. Fritsche, R. Mennel, L. Norton, P. Ravdin, S. Taube, M. R. Somerfield, D. F. Hayes, and R. C. Bast Jr
American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2007; 25(33): 5287 - 5312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
G. Soletormos, P. H. Petersen, and D. Nielsen
Computer-simulated Tumor-Marker Data Used to Compare Progression Criteria for Cytokeratin Tissue Polypeptide Antigen in Metastatic Breast Cancer
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2001; 47(11): 2035 - 2037.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. F. Hayes, H. Yamauchi, G. Broadwater, C. T. Cirrincione, S. P. Rodrigue, D. A. Berry, J. Younger, L. L. Panasci, F. Millard, D. B. Duggan, et al.
Circulating HER-2/erbB-2/c-neu (HER-2) Extracellular Domain as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 8662
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2001; 7(9): 2703 - 2711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F. Guadagni, P. Ferroni, S. Carlini, S. Mariotti, A. Spila, S. Aloe, R. D'Alessandro, M. D. Carone, A. Cicchetti, A. Ricciotti, et al.
A Re-Evaluation of Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) as a Serum Marker for Breast Cancer: A Prospective Longitudinal Study
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 7(8): 2357 - 2362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
G. Soletormos, P. Hyltoft Petersen, and P. Dombernowsky
Progression Criteria for Cancer Antigen 15.3 and Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Metastatic Breast Cancer Compared by Computer Simulation of Marker Data
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2000; 46(7): 939 - 949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Engelmann, S. E. Baldus, and F.-G. Hanisch
Identification and Topology of Variant Sequences within Individual Repeat Domains of the Human Epithelial Tumor Mucin MUC1
J. Biol. Chem., July 20, 2001; 276(30): 27764 - 27769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1988 by the American Association for Cancer Research.