| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Pharmacology Branch, Clinical Oncology Program [B. K. S., N. H., L. D.], and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology [D. K., Y. P.], National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Pleotropic resistant human breast cancer cells (MCF-7), selected for resistance to Adriamycin, were used to study the production of DNA strand breaks by etoposide (VP-16) and its relationship to drug cytotoxicity. It was shown that the resistant MCF-7 cell line was cross-resistant to VP-16, and the degree of resistance was found to be 125200-fold. Alkaline elution studies indicated that the parental cell line was very sensitive to VP-16 which caused extensive DNA strand breakage. In contrast, little DNA strand breakage was detected in the resistant MCF-7 cells, even at very high drug concentrations, indicating a good agreement between strand breaks and cytotoxicity. Further studies indicated that the nuclei isolated from the parental cell line were more resistant to VP-16-induced DNA strand breaks than the intact cells, while the opposite was found in the resistant cell line. In addition, the alkaline elution studies in isolated nuclei showed only a 2-fold reduction of VP-16-induced DNA breaks in nuclei from the resistant cells. In agreement with this result, it was found that nuclear extract from the resistant cells produced 2-3-fold less VP-16-induced DNA breaks than that from the sensitive cells in 32P-end-labeled SV40 DNA. VP-16 uptake and efflux studies indicated that there was a 23-fold decrease in net cellular accumulation of VP-16 in the resistant cells. Although the reduced uptake of VP-16 and decreased drug sensitivity of topoisomerase II appear to contribute to the mechanism of action and the development of resistance to VP-16, they do not completely explain the degree of resistance to VP-16 in this multidrug-resistant MCF-7 cell line indicating that other biochemical factors, such as activation of VP-16, are also involved in drug resistance and suggesting that the resistance is multifactorial.
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Bldg. 10, Room 6N-119, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892.
2 Present address: Department of Radiation and Clinical Oncology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel 91120.
Received 10/21/87. Revised 3/ 1/88. Revised 6/ 7/88. Accepted 6/14/88.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. A. Rao, K. Agama, S. Holbeck, and Y. Pommier Batracylin (NSC 320846), a Dual Inhibitor of DNA Topoisomerases I and II Induces Histone {gamma}-H2AX as a Biomarker of DNA Damage Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 67(20): 9971 - 9979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Huang, S. Duan, W. K. Bleibel, E. O. Kistner, W. Zhang, T. A. Clark, T. X. Chen, A. C. Schweitzer, J. E. Blume, N. J. Cox, et al. A genome-wide approach to identify genetic variants that contribute to etoposide-induced cytotoxicity PNAS, June 5, 2007; 104(23): 9758 - 9763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lu and D. J. Waxman Antitumor Activity of Methoxymorpholinyl Doxorubicin: Potentiation by Cytochrome P450 3A Metabolism Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2005; 67(1): 212 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |