Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 48, 5178-5182, September 15, 1988]
© 1988 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kern, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Driscoll, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kern, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Driscoll, J. S.

Structure-Activity Relationships Defining the Cytotoxicity of Catechol Analogues against Human Malignant Melanoma1

David H. Kern2, Robert H. Shoemaker, Susanne U. Hildebrand-Zanki and John S. Driscoll

Research Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Sepulveda, California 91343 [D. H. K.]; Division of Surgical Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Clinic, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90024 [D. H. K., S. U. H-Z.]; and Developmental Therapeutics Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [R. H. S., J. S. D.]

The cytotoxic activities of three new synthetic catechol analogues, ß-[(p-hydroxyphenyl)amino]alanine (Compound 1), Nb-(p-hydroxyphenyl)ornithine (Compound 2), and Nb-(m-hydroxyphenyl)ornithine (Compound 3), were determined against 10 human melanoma and 5 nonmelanoma cell lines. Activities of L-DOPA and 3,4-dihydroxybenzylamine were also measured. Dose-response curves were obtained and concentrations in µg/ml required to give 90% inhibition of colony formation (IC90) were calculated. Using a cutoff IC90 of <2.5 as a definition of activity, Compound 2 was active in 6 of 10 melanoma and 0 of 5 nonmelanoma cell lines while both Compound 1 and L-DOPA methyl ester were active in 1 of 10 melanomas and 0 of 5 nonmelanomas. Compound 3 was inactive in all cell lines and all IC90 values exceeded 100. 3,4-Dihydroxybenzylamine was active in 3 of 8 melanomas and 1 of 5 nonmelanomas. Regression analysis of IC90 values for Compound 2 and tyrosinase levels in the 15 cell lines yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.93 (P < 0.001). By contrast, a similar analysis for 3,4-dihydroxybenzylamine gave a correlation coefficient of 0.17 (P > 0.05). Spectrophotometric data indicated that Compounds 1 and 2 were oxidized by tyrosinase to quinones. Cytotoxic activity was blocked by the tyrosinase inhibitor phenylthiocarbamide. Since the rates of activation of Compounds 1 and 2 were identical, the higher activity of Compound 2 was probably due to its higher lipophilicity and greater intracellular accumulation. Compounds 1 and 2 exhibited greater potency and selectivity against malignant melanoma than did the natural product L-DOPA methyl ester.

1 This work was supported by Contract CM 57710 from the National Cancer Institute and by the Veterans Administration Medical Research Service.

2 Present address: Oncotech, Inc., 1791 Kaiser Ave., Irvine, CA 92714.

Received 12/10/87. Revised 6/10/88. Accepted 6/21/88.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1988 by the American Association for Cancer Research.