Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 48, 5565-5569, October 1, 1988]
© 1988 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shek, L. L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Godolphin, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shek, L. L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Godolphin, W.

Model for Breast Cancer Survival: Relative Prognostic Roles of Axillary Nodal Status, TNM Stage, Estrogen Receptor Concentration, and Tumor Necrosis1

Lydia L. M. Shek and William Godolphin2

Department of Pathology, The University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 1M9

The independent prognostic effects of certain clinical and pathological variables measured at the time of primary diagnosis were assessed with Cox multivariate regression analysis. The 859 patients with primary breast cancer, on which the proportional hazards model was based, had a median follow-up of 60 months. Axillary nodal status (categorized as N0,N1–3 or N4+) was the most significant and independent factor in overall survival, but inclusion of TNM stage, estrogen receptor (ER) concentration and tumor necrosis significantly improved survival predictions. Predictions made with the model showed striking subset survival differences within stage: 5-year survival from 36% (N4+, log[ER] = 0, marked necrosis) to 96% (N0, log0[ER] = 6, no necrosis) in TNM I, and from 0 to 70% for the same categories in TNM IV. Results of the model were used to classify patients into four distinct risk groups according to a derived hazard index. An 8-fold variation in survival was seen with the highest (>3) to lowest index values (<1). Each hazard index level included patients with varied combinations of the above factors, but could be considered to denote the same degree of risk of breast cancer mortality. A model with ER concentration, nodal status, and tumor necrosis was found to best predict survival after disease recurrence in 369 patients, thus confirming the enduring biological significance of these factors.

1 This research was supported by grants from the British Columbia Health Care Research Foundation and the British Columbia Cancer Foundation.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 1/29/88. Revised 5/27/88. Accepted 7/ 1/88.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
M. C.U. Cheang, D. O. Treaba, C. H. Speers, I. A. Olivotto, C. D. Bajdik, S. K. Chia, L. C. Goldstein, K. A. Gelmon, D. Huntsman, C. B. Gilks, et al.
Immunohistochemical Detection Using the New Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody SP1 of Estrogen Receptor in Breast Cancer Is Superior to Mouse Monoclonal Antibody 1D5 in Predicting Survival
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2006; 24(36): 5637 - 5644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Leppa, T. Saarto, L. Vehmanen, C. Blomqvist, and I. Elomaa
A High Serum Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Level Is Associated with an Adverse Prognosis in Node-Positive Breast Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2004; 10(3): 1057 - 1063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Recent Prog Horm ResHome page
E. Huang, M. West, and J. R. Nevins
Gene Expression Profiling for Prediction of Clinical Characteristics of Breast Cancer
Recent Prog. Horm. Res., January 1, 2003; 58(1): 55 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. West, C. Blanchette, H. Dressman, E. Huang, S. Ishida, R. Spang, H. Zuzan, J. A. Olson Jr., J. R. Marks, and J. R. Nevins
Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles
PNAS, September 13, 2001; (2001) 201162998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
C S Thomson, D J Hole, C J Twelves, D H Brewster, and R J Black
Prognostic factors in women with breast cancer: distribution by socioeconomic status and effect on differences in survival
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, May 1, 2001; 55(5): 308 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. West, C. Blanchette, H. Dressman, E. Huang, S. Ishida, R. Spang, H. Zuzan, J. A. Olson Jr., J. R. Marks, and J. R. Nevins
Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles
PNAS, September 25, 2001; 98(20): 11462 - 11467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1988 by the American Association for Cancer Research.