Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 48, 5686-5691, October 15, 1988]
© 1988 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sirotnak, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sirotnak, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, J. A.

Structural Design, Biochemical Properties, and Evidence for Improved Therapeutic Activity of 5-Alkyl Derivatives of 5-Deazaaminopterin and 5-Deazamethotrexate Compared to Methotrexate in Murine Tumor Models1

F. M. Sirotnak2, F. A. Schmid, G. M. Otter, J. R. Piper and J. A. Montgomery

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, [F. M. S., F. A. S., G. M. O.], and Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, Alabama 35255 [J. R. P., J. A. M.]

Studies are described examining a new class of 4-aminofolate analogues modified by an N to C conversion and alkyl substitution at the N-5 position of aminopterin and methotrexate. All of these analogues were equivalent to aminopterin and methotrexate as inhibitors of tumor cell dihydrofolate reductase (K1 = 3.49-5.16 pM). N to C conversion at the N-5 position of aminopterin reduced its influx (inferred from the change in K1) 3-fold, but the same modification increased influx of methotrexate 2–3-fold in Sarcoma 180 cells. Alkylation (methyl or ethyl) of this position on 5-deazaaminopterin increased influx 3-fold, while a similar alteration of 5-deazamethotrexate increased influx 4–5-fold. Influx of the methotrexate analogues was increased a total of 14-fold as a result of these modifications. Similar differences among these analogues were observed for inhibition of Sarcoma 180 cell growth in culture. Inhibitory potency was in the ascending order methotrexate < 5-deazamethotrexate < 5-deazaaminopterin < aminopterin < 5-alkyl (methyl or ethyl) analogues of 5-deazaaminopterin and 5-deazamethotrexate (the ethyl analogues were 2-fold more inhibitory than the methyl analogues). All of the analogues examined were equivalent in regard to efflux from Sarcoma 180 cells. Differences in transport alone did not account for all of the increased inhibitory potency (up to 33-fold) of the 5-alkyl-5-deaza analogues compared to the parent compounds. The extent of polyglutamylation of 5-deazaaminopterin and 5-deazamethotrexate and their 5-alkyl derivatives in Sarcoma 180 cells was substantially less compared to aminopterin and equivalent to methotrexate. Transport inward of 5-deazaaminopterin in isolated crypt cell epithelium from mouse small intestine was 2-fold lower than aminopterin (influx Km = 14.2 ± 2 µM), while influx of 5-deazamethotrexate was 2-fold greater than methotrexate (influx Km = 98.6 ± 23). However, transport inward of all of 5-alkyl derivatives of these 5-deaza analogues was intermediate [influx Km = 44.4 ± 11 (SEM) to 49.8 ± 12 µM] between values for aminopterin and methotrexate. These differences accounted, to some extent, for the reduced toxicity of the 5-alkyl-5-deazaaminopterin analogues compared to aminopterin and the increased toxicity of 5-methyl-5-deazamethotrexate compared to methotrexate. All of the 5-alkyl derivatives of aminopterin and methotrexate were more active in vivo than methotrexate against four murine tumor models. Modest improvement in activity over methotrexate was observed in the Lewis lung tumor, but substantially greater improvement (3–6-fold greater reduction in tumor growth) was observed for some of these analogues against Sarcoma 180 and T241 fibrosarcoma. Greatest improvement in activity (10–20-fold greater reduction in tumor growth compared to methotrexate) was seen with the EO771 mammary adenocarcinoma. On a schedule of once per day for 5 days, a number of animals (10–60%) treated with these new analogues were tumor free shortly after cessation of therapy.

1 Supported in part by Grants CA-08748, CA-18856, CA-22764, and CA-25236 from the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services and the Elsa U. Pardee Foundation.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Laboratory for Molecular Therapeutics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021.

Received 3/31/88. Revised 7/ 1/88. Accepted 7/14/88.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1988 by the American Association for Cancer Research.