| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
-Interferon in the Treatment of Established Murine Hepatic Metastases
Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
We investigated the antitumor effects of combined immunotherapy with recombinant human interleukin-2 (rhIL-2) and the recombinant human interferon-
(rhIFN-
) A/D hybrid in the treatment of established single or multiple murine hepatic metastases. Mice bearing either weakly immunogenic MCA-106 or nonimmunogenic MCA-102 were treated with rhIL-2 alone, rhIFN-
alone, or the combination of lymphokines. Therapy was initiated on Day 3 or 10 and continued for 34 consecutive days. In the treatment of 3- and 10-day multiple MCA-106 liver metastases, significant reductions in the number of metastases, often more than 90%, were observed with the combination of rhIL-2 and rhIFN-
at doses of each lymphokine which had no effect when given alone. This decrease in the number of metastases resulted in a survival benefit that was seen in the combination therapy groups in a dose-dependent manner. Similarly, substantial reductions in tumor weight were seen when the combination of rhIL-2 and rhIFN-
was administered to mice with single large hepatic metastases. The decreases in both single and multiple metastatic tumor deposits by the combination of lymphokines were more than that predicted by the additive effect of each treatment alone. With the nonimmunogenic tumor, MCA-102, however, no benefit was derived from the addition of rhIFN-
to rhIL-2 therapy. Immunotherapy with recombinant murine interferon-
and rhIL-2 was directly compared to therapy with rhIL-2 and rhIFN-
. The combination of rhIL-2 and rhIFN-
again was found to be effective while recombinant murine interferon-
added toxicity but no therapeutic benefit to immunotherapy with rhIL-2 alone. The synergy between rhIL-2 and rhIFN-
was shown to be dependent on the host's intact immune system since mice immunosuppressed by sublethal irradiation prior to inoculation of tumor did not respond to the combined treatment. Possible mechanisms of the in vivo synergy between rhIL-2 and rhIFN-
are discussed.
1 To whom all correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed, at Surgery Branch, Building 10, Room 2B42, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Received 4/13/88. Revised 7/ 8/88. Accepted 7/15/88.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Aass, P. H.M. De Mulder, G. H.J. Mickisch, P. Mulders, A. T. van Oosterom, H. van Poppel, S. D. Fossa, L. de Prijck, and R. J. Sylvester Randomized Phase II/III Trial of Interferon Alfa-2a With and Without 13-cis-Retinoic Acid in Patients With Progressive Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary Tract Cancer Group (EORTC 30951) J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2005; 23(18): 4172 - 4178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nagata, T. Arai, Y. Soejima, H. Suzuki, H. Ishii, and T. Hibi Limited Capability of Regional Lymph Nodes to Eradicate Metastatic Cancer Cells Cancer Res., November 15, 2004; 64(22): 8239 - 8248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. I. Clark, T. M. Kuzel, T. M. Lestingi, S. G. Fisher, P. Sorokin, B. Martone, M. Viola, and J. A. Sosman A multi-institutional phase II trial of a novel inpatient schedule of continuous interleukin-2 with interferon {alpha}-2b in advanced renal cell carcinoma: major durable responses in a less highly selected patient population Ann. Onc., April 1, 2002; 13(4): 606 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Dutcher, T. Logan, M. Gordon, J. Sosman, G. Weiss, K. Margolin, T. Plasse, J. Mier, M. Lotze, J. Clark, et al. Phase II Trial of Interleukin 2, Interferon {{alpha}}, and 5-Fluorouracil in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: A Cytokine Working Group Study Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2000; 6(9): 3442 - 3450. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Li, S. A. Furman, C. R. Bradford, and A. E. Chang Expanded Tumor-reactive CD4+ T-Cell Responses to Human Cancers Induced by Secondary Anti-CD3/Anti-CD28 Activation Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 1999; 5(2): 461 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |