Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 48, 6017-6024, November 1, 1988]
© 1988 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montine, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Borch, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Montine, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Borch, R. F.

Quiescent LLC-PK1 Cells as a Model for cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum(II) Nephrotoxicity and Modulation by Thiol Rescue Agents1

Thomas J. Montine and Richard F. Borch2

Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14642

Confluent LLC-PK1 cells express many characteristics of renal proximal tubule epithelia. We report here the use of this cell line to investigate the possible mechanisms of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (DDP)-induced nephrotoxicity and diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) amelioration. Cells were exposed to platinum-based drug for 1 h and then incubated in drug-free medium until assayed. There was a 10-h delay between DDP exposure and onset of toxicity which then continued to develop. Viability at 72 h was 97 ± 2 (SD), 68 ± 3, 33 ± 3, and 10 ± 2% of control after treatment with 100, 200, 300, and 400 µM DDP, respectively. trans-Diamminedichloroplatinum(II) was 5-fold less toxic than DDP and diammine(1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato)platinum(II) (CBDCA) was nontoxic at concentrations up to 2.0 mM. Incubation of cells with DDTC (3 mM) for 1 h immediately following DDP exposure resulted in chelation of 43% of total intracellular platinum by DDTC and significantly increased 72 h viability; 97 ± 2, 88 ± 3, and 42 ± 2% of control for 200, 300, and 400 µM DDP, respectively. DDP treatment of L1210 cells yielded equivalent total intracellular platinum levels, but Pt(DDTC)2 concentrations were one-tenth those in LLC-PK1 cells after subsequent treatment with DDTC (3 mM).

Immediate reduction of protein and RNA, but not DNA, synthesis by DDP was concentration dependent over the same range as viability. DDP-induced increases in unscheduled DNA synthesis also did not correlate with cytotoxicity. The inhibition of protein synthesis was unchanged by pretreatment with the RNA synthesis inhibitor actinomycin D. DDTC (3 mM) exposure produced an immediate and persistent DDP dose modification of 1.6 in protein but not RNA synthesis. CBDCA (0.5 to 1.0 mM) had no effect on protein, RNA, or DNA synthesis and only slight stimulatory effects on unscheduled DNA synthesis. DDTC alone (3–3000 µM) caused significant reduction in DNA synthesis and unscheduled DNA synthesis. Neither sodium thiosulfate nor 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate had any effect on DDP-induced cytotoxicity or inhibition of protein, RNA, or DNA synthesis when incubated immediately after DDP, even though these drugs achieved intracellular concentrations at which DDTC was protective.

These data indicate that quiescent LLC-PK1 cells are a good in vitro model for the study of DDP-induced nephrotoxicity and its modulation by thiol rescue agents and that DDP inhibition and DDTC rescue of posttranscriptional processes correlate best with viability in LLC-PK1 cells.

1 This work was supported in part by Grants CA 34620 and CA 11198 from The National Cancer Institute.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 2/23/88. Revised 5/24/88. Revised 7/24/88. Accepted 7/26/88.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
G. Ciarimboli, T. Ludwig, D. Lang, H. Pavenstadt, H. Koepsell, H.-J. Piechota, J. Haier, U. Jaehde, J. Zisowsky, and E. Schlatter
Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity Is Critically Mediated via the Human Organic Cation Transporter 2
Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2005; 167(6): 1477 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. Satoh, N. Kashihara, S. Fujimoto, H. Horike, T. Tokura, T. Namikoshi, T. Sasaki, and H. Makino
A Novel Free Radical Scavenger, Edarabone, Protects Against Cisplatin-Induced Acute Renal Damage in Vitro and in Vivo
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2003; 305(3): 1183 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
D. M. Townsend, M. Deng, L. Zhang, M. G. Lapus, and M. H. Hanigan
Metabolism of Cisplatin to a Nephrotoxin in Proximal Tubule Cells
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2003; 14(1): 1 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1988 by the American Association for Cancer Research.