Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 48, 6850-6854, December 1, 1988]
© 1988 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X. W.
Right arrow Articles by Costa, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X. W.
Right arrow Articles by Costa, M.

Characterization of Mouse Cell Lines Resistant to Nickel(II) Ions1

Xin Wei Wang2, Richard J. Imbra and Max Costa

Institute of Environmental Medicine, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York 10016

BALB/c-3T3 cells have been isolated that are resistant to NiCl2. The degree of resistance is directly dependent upon the NiCl2 exposure concentration and ranges from 6- to 11-fold. Resistance to NiCl2 does not appear to be due to alterations in cellular uptake, since the entry of Ni(II) into wild-type or resistant cells was similar. Resistance does not appear to be due to alterations in metallothionein expression. Resistant cells have a high incidence of heterochromatic abnormalities involving fusions at the centromeres as determined by C-banding and in situ hybridization utilizing a cloned mouse satellite DNA probe. Cells retain nickel resistance for many generations in the absence or presence of NiCl2 selection; however, with time in the absence of NiCl2, the level of resistance decreases. This loss of resistance is associated with a decreased number of centromeric fusions. These results indicate that nickel resistance is involved with changes in heterochromatin and suggest that this effect of nickel on heterochromatin may be important as an early step in nickel carcinogenesis.

1 This work is supported by Grant CA43070 of the National Cancer Institute and Grant R813140-010 of the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Institute of Environmental Medicine, New York University Medical Center, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016.

Received 3/24/88. Revised 6/ 7/88. Revised 8/16/88. Accepted 8/29/88.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
K. Salnikow, W. G. An, G. Melillo, M. V. Blagosklonny, and M. Costa
Nickel-induced transformation shifts the balance between HIF-1 and p53 transcription factors
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 1999; 20(9): 1819 - 1823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1988 by the American Association for Cancer Research.