Cancer Research Landon Prizes for Basic and Translational Cancer Research  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 48, 1060-1065, March 1, 1988]
© 1988 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kendal, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Frost, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kendal, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Frost, P.

Pitfalls and Practice of Luria-Delbrück Fluctuation Analysis: A Review1

Wayne S. Kendal2 and Philip Frost3

Departments of Cell Biology [W. S. K., P. F.] and Medicine [P. F.], The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute at Houston, Houston, Texas 77030

Luria-Delbrück fluctuation analysis provides a method to estimate mutation rates in cell populations. Originally designed for bacterial populations, the method now is widely applied in somatic cell genetics and in cancer biology. However, there are fundamental genetic differences between bacteria and somatic cells, and this together with the inherent mathematical complexity of fluctuation analysis can lead to many pitfalls in its application. In addition there is considerable statistical error associated with the method. The use, misuse, and limitations of fluctuation analysis are reviewed here with the hope that such problems may be avoided.

1 Supported in part by USPHS Grants CA 39853 and CA 41525, the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, and the R. E. "Bob" Smith Fund.

2 Fellow of the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at the Department of Cell Biology, Box 173, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute at Houston, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030.

Received 4/29/87. Revised 10/22/87. Accepted 11/20/87.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
C. Hornsby, K. M. Page, and I. Tomlinson
The in Vivo Rate of Somatic Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Mutation
Am. J. Pathol., April 1, 2008; 172(4): 1062 - 1068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. G. Chen, Y. C. Wang, M. E. Schaner, B. Francisco, G. E. Duran, D. Juric, L. M. Huff, H. Padilla-Nash, T. Ried, T. Fojo, et al.
Genetic and Epigenetic Modeling of the Origins of Multidrug-Resistant Cells in a Human Sarcoma Cell Line
Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9388 - 9397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. J. Araten, D. W. Golde, R. H. Zhang, H. T. Thaler, L. Gargiulo, R. Notaro, and L. Luzzatto
A Quantitative Measurement of the Human Somatic Mutation Rate
Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 65(18): 8111 - 8117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Kim, B. N. Trinh, T. I. Long, S. Oghamian, and P. W. Laird
Dnmt1 deficiency leads to enhanced microsatellite instability in mouse embryonic stem cells
Nucleic Acids Res., October 27, 2004; 32(19): 5742 - 5749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. Eden, F. Gaudet, A. Waghmare, and R. Jaenisch
Chromosomal Instability and Tumors Promoted by DNA Hypomethylation
Science, April 18, 2003; 300(5618): 455 - 455.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
N. J. Saunders, E. R. Moxon, and M. B. Gravenor
Mutation rates: estimating phase variation rates when fitness differences are present and their impact on population structure
Microbiology, February 1, 2003; 149(2): 485 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. F. Chan, R. van Amerongen, T. Nijjar, E. Cuppen, P. A. Jones, and P. W. Laird
Reduced Rates of Gene Loss, Gene Silencing, and Gene Mutation in Dnmt1-Deficient Embryonic Stem Cells
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2001; 21(22): 7587 - 7600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. E. Luker, C. M. Pica, R. D. Schreiber, and D. Piwnica-Worms
Overexpression of IRF9 Confers Resistance to Antimicrotubule Agents in Breast Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., September 1, 2001; 61(17): 6540 - 6547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1988 by the American Association for Cancer Research.