Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 48, 2388-2395, May 1, 1988]
© 1988 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harper, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Okey, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harper, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Okey, A. B.

Characterization of the Ah Receptor and Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase Induction by 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and Benz(a)anthracene in the Human A431 Squamous Cell Carcinoma Line1

Patricia A. Harper, Cheryl L. Golas and Allan B. Okey2

Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Pediatrics, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children; and Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Certain human cell lines previously have been shown to exhibit substantial induction of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase (AHH, cytochrome P450IA1) when treated in culture with aromatic hydrocarbons such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) or benz(a)anthracene. Yet the Ah receptor, which is known to mediate the AHH induction process in rodent cells and tissues, has not previously appeared to be present at a significant level in any human cell line. In the human A431 squamous cell carcinoma line we found that cytosolic Ah receptor was present in high concentration (~200 fmol/mg cytosol protein at maximal saturation); this corresponds to approximately 10,000 Ah receptor sites per cell in the human A431 line compared with about 35,000 receptor sites per cell in the mouse Hepa-1 hepatoma cell line in which Ah receptor previously has been extensively characterized. Detection of Ah receptor in A431 cytosol required modification of assay techniques, especially reduction in the amount of charcoal used to adsorb nonspecifically bound radioligand. The specific binding peak from A431 cytosol sedimented ~9S on sucrose gradients, the same as the cytosolic receptor from the well-characterized mouse Hepa-1 hepatoma cell line. In addition to [3H]TCDD, specific binding to Ah receptor in A431 cytosol also was detected with [3H]3-methylcholanthrene and with [3H]benzo(a)pyrene as radioligands.

A specific [3H]TCDD-Ah receptor complex was extracted from nuclei of A431 cells incubated in culture at 37°C with [3H]TCDD. The nuclear form of Ah receptor sedimented ~5S, the same as the nuclear receptor from mouse Hepa-1 cells. AHH activity was induced in A431 cells treated in culture with TCDD or benz(a)anthracene. The maximum level of induced AHH activity that could be achieved in A431 cells was about 20% of the maximally induced level in the mouse Hepa-1 cell line. However, the dose-response curves for AHH induction by TCDD or benz(a)anthracene in A431 cells were shifted about one log unit to the right of the curves for Hepa-1 cells. The lower sensitivity of A431 cells to AHH inducers was in proportion to the lower affinity with which cytosolic Ah receptor in A431 cells bound [3H]TCDD. The saturation curve for binding of [3H]TCDD to cytosolic Ah receptor in A431 cells also was shifted about one log unit to the right of the curve for saturation of the cytosolic receptor from mouse Hepa-1 cells. The A431 cell line provides the first human model in which it can be shown that there is substantial cytosolic Ah receptor, that the receptor-ligand complex binds to nuclei, and that there is subsequent expression of increased AHH activity.

1 This work was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute of Canada to A. B. O.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8.

Received 10/14/87. Revised 2/ 2/88. Accepted 2/ 8/88.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
A. B. Okey
An Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Odyssey to the Shores of Toxicology: The Deichmann Lecture, International Congress of Toxicology-XI
Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2007; 98(1): 5 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
Q. Ma and A. Y. H. Lu
CYP1A Induction and Human Risk Assessment: An Evolving Tale of in Vitro and in Vivo Studies
Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2007; 35(7): 1009 - 1016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
P. Ramadoss and G. H. Perdew
Use of 2-Azido-3-[125I]iodo-7,8-dibromodibenzo-p-dioxin as a Probe to Determine the Relative Ligand Affinity of Human versus Mouse Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Cultured Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2004; 66(1): 129 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1988 by the American Association for Cancer Research.